My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1989-1996
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1989-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 9:40:02 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1989-1996
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1989-1996.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
660
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Periodic Site Review <br /> 2 of 4 <br /> KEY POINTS OF THE REVIEW <br /> Analysis <br /> The reviewing engineer should consider how each aspect of the <br /> facility affects the environment, public health and safety. <br /> by examining the following sets of criteria relating to a <br /> facility, and answering the accompanying questions, an engineer <br /> should be able to renommend to the operator the most appropriate <br /> methods for design, operation and environmental controls. In <br /> addition, the engineer will be able to conclude whether the <br /> facility's operations, designs and environmental controls fall <br /> short, meet or exceed current technology and regulatory <br /> requirements. After receiving the recommendations and <br /> conclusions from the engineering review, an operator will have <br /> the guidance necessary to operate a landfill that will not harm <br /> the environment, public health and safety. <br /> A. Design: how does the facility's design, future or existing, <br /> affect the environment, public health and safety? Is the <br /> existing design adequate? Why or why not? Design factors <br /> include, but are not limited to, the following: (consider <br /> each one separately) <br /> 1. Site capacity, site life <br /> 2. Construction/site development <br /> 3. Access to site <br /> 4 . Surrounding land development <br /> 5. Geological/hydrogeological conditions with respect to <br /> site design <br /> 6. Soil conditions with respect to site design <br /> 7. Other (specify) <br /> B. Operations: do current operations affect the environment, <br /> public health and safety? Why or why not? Do current <br /> operations comply with current regulations? How? If not, <br /> explain• necessary steps to bring facility into compliance. <br /> Operational factors include, but are not limited to, the <br /> following: (consider each one separately) <br /> 1. Personnel <br /> 2. Equipment <br /> 3. Site safety measures <br /> April 1989 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.