My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1989-1996
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1989-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 9:40:02 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1989-1996
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1989-1996.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
660
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. <br />« <br />L` <br />Mr. Bernard Vlach <br />August 13, 1991 <br />Page 3 <br />This interim condensate return program would continue until <br />such time as the City's aquifer treatment system became <br />operational. At that time, assuming successful royalty <br />negotiations with Stockton, Pacific Energy would complete the <br />installation of the non -returning sealed traps (if not already <br />completed) and route all plant and field condensate to the City's <br />aquifer treatment facility or alternate system. <br />This proposal is different than the one we discussed on <br />August 4, 1991 where I indicated that Pacific Energy would be <br />willing to stop the return of the facility condensate <br />immediately. Regrettably, further analysis has shown that this <br />interim solution is cost prohibitive. We estimate it will cost <br />at a minimum, $75,000 over a ten month period to have the <br />facility condensate disposed of. <br />Based on the above, we feel that it is in the best interest <br />of all the parties concerned that we work together to keep this <br />project operational. In that light, we urge you to consider and <br />accept our proposal which will not place any undue financial <br />burden on us, yet allow the City and County to continue receiving <br />the not insubstantial benefits of the project. I appreciate the <br />time you and your staff have spent working on this project and <br />hope to hear from you soon. <br />Respectfully yours, <br />A,� , � S./� <br />George E. Donlou <br />Manager of Biogas <br />Business Administration <br />GED:ew <br />cc: Ed Padilla -San Joaquin Public Health Services <br />Mike Miller -City of Stockton <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.