Laserfiche WebLink
Table 4. COST ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES TO <br />HARNEY LANE LANDFILL REPLACEMENT <br />$1,000/yr <br />Transfer and haul <br />Collection and haul California Proposed <br />Other (non- Waste Eight <br />Franchisee franchised) General Removal Mile Rd/ <br />LodiLAdi city. 2b cortmercial public Subtotal Systems c Highway 99 Disposal Total <br />A. <br />USE PROPOSED NEW HARNEY LANE LANDFILL <br />1. <br />Haul directly or transfer at existing <br />1,175 <br />172' <br />146 <br />431 <br />1,924 <br />416 <br />— 637d <br />2,977 <br />California Waste Removal Systems <br />facility in Lodi (proposed project) <br />2. <br />In addition to A.1, transfer at new <br />1,175 <br />172' <br />92 <br />291 <br />1,730 <br />392 <br />319 6370 <br />3,078 <br />site midway between Lodi and Stockton <br />(for planning purposes, located at <br />Eight Mile Road and Highway 99) <br />C. <br />USE EXISTING F007HIL.L LANDFILL <br />1. <br />Haul directly or transfer at existing <br />1,175 <br />191' <br />151 <br />461 <br />1,978 <br />566 <br />— 319E <br />2,863 <br />California Waste Removal Systems <br />facility in Lodi <br />2,881 <br />2. <br />In adcition to C.1, transfer at new <br />1,175 <br />1549 <br />96 <br />266 <br />1,691 <br />493 <br />378 319E <br />site midway between Lodi and Stockton <br />(for planning purposes, located at <br />Eight Mile Road and Highway 99) <br />D. <br />USE PROPOSED CENTRAL COUNTY LANDFILL <br />(for planning purposes, located on <br />Austin Road, 2 miles south of Arch <br />Road in Stockton) <br />1. <br />Haul directly or transfer at existing <br />1,175 <br />184' <br />106 <br />372 <br />1,839 <br />467 <br />— 437h <br />2,743 <br />California Waste Removal Systems <br />facility in Lodi <br />1549 <br />87 <br />302 <br />1,718 <br />442 <br />322 437h <br />2,919 <br />2. <br />In addition to D.1, transfer at new <br />1,175 <br />site midway between Lodi and Stockton <br />(for planning purposes, located at <br />Eight Mile Road and Highway 99) <br />Notes: <br />1. This table is essentially a revision and update of Table B-1 in the 1979 County solid Waste Plan. However, the alternatives, <br />assumptions, and methods used to prepare this table are different than Table 8-1. Therefore, direct comparisons between this table <br />and Table 8-1 should not be made. <br />2. This table is for a "base case," i.e., an initial set of assumptions and bases of calculations. Costs for other assumptions and <br />bases are in Table 6. <br />a. Data from Hekimian & Associates. Cost are expected to remain the sane for all alternatives. <br />b. Based on data from Central valley Disposal Service. <br />c. Based on data from Hekimian s Associates, adjusted for forecasted 1990 waste volumes. <br />d. Metcalf s Eddy estimate based on (1) Raymond Vail and Associates, Draft EIR, Harney Lane Landfill Replacement Site, June 1981; and <br />(2) discussions with San Joaquin County Public Works Department. <br />e. Assumes franchisee does not use any transfer station and hauls directly to a landfill. <br />f. Additional contract fee paid by County to Foothill Landfill, based on proportion of additional waste volume to existing volume <br />received, as discussed with San Joaquin County Public Works Department. Includes administration and overhead cost formerly assigned <br />to Harney Lane Landfill. <br />g. Assures franchisee uses Eight Mile Road transfer station. <br />h. Estimated additional cost of acquiring, developing, and operating a 640 -acre landfill, instead of a 320 -acre site, to accommodate <br />north county waste acid central county waste. Based on cost developed for new Harney Lane Landfill (footnote d). Includes <br />administration and overhead formerly assigned to Harpy Lase Landfill - <br />0 <br />m <br />