ARCHIVED REPORTS_1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

In addition to the differences in alternatives described previously, the tables were prepared using different assumptions and bases, as summarized in the following tabulations Item Population and waste quantity forecast, yr Date of cost estimate, yr Harney Lane Landfill site replacement location Existing transfer stations Derivation of disposal costs New Harney Lane Landfill Foothill Landfill Proposed central county landfill Transfer station, type (Eight Mile Roao/Highway 99 site) Sites used to compute collection and haul costs for public and other commerical haulers Assumption, or basis This study Table 8-1 in 1979 SWMP 1990 1985 1983 Specific location California Waste Removal Systems facility in Lodi, opened 1981 Based on EIR--more site specific than, 1979 SWMP Additional contract fee based on proportion of additional waste volumes to existing volume received based on Harney Lane estimate adjusted for size Similar to existing California Waste Removal Systems facility in Lodi Trips to closest site 1978 Not specified; also used existing site None Update of 1973 and 1975 studies, which were not site specific S/ton charge to users S/ton charge to users Push pit/stationary compactor All trips to specified site(s) Because of these differences --especially the last three items (derivation of disposal costs, transfer station type, and sites used to compute collection and haul costs for public and other commercial haulers) --cost figures in Table 4 will necessarily not be the same as comparable figures in Table 8-1 of the 1979 SWMP. Therefore, direct comparisons between Table 4 and Table 8-1 of the 1979 SWMP should not be made. Collection and Haul. The collection and haul cost for the Lodi City franchisee is not expected to be affected by any of the alternatives, since it is assumed the franchisee will continue to use the California Waste Removal Systems transfer station for any of the alternatives.