Laserfiche WebLink
Cost Analysis of Private vs Public Operations (Con't ) <br /> It is, however, anticipated that the proposed operations <br /> will conform totally with all regulations , whereas the present <br /> operations are somewhat less than required. <br /> In contrast , the operator of the Stockton City site on <br /> Austin Road handles an estimated 338 tons per day at an annual <br /> cost of $92,000. <br /> The operations of Foothill Sanitary Landfill handle <br /> approximately 95 tons per day at a cost of $105, 000 annually. <br /> There appears to be some difference of cost between private <br /> operations and public operations . The aforementioned sites <br /> differ in volumes and characteristics and all sites could <br /> conceivably handle larger volumes at very little increase in <br /> cost . Private or public operations under terms of identical <br /> requirements should not differ significantly in cost. <br /> Public operations may have the added advantage of better <br /> control and greater flexibility to change . Service to the <br /> people and public relations may be an important factor which can <br /> be accomplished more effectively under public operations . <br /> A proposal to the City of Lodi by Easley & Brassy Corporation <br /> through Sanitary City Disposal Company contains certain <br /> innovations which deserve some analysis and comments . <br /> The proposal outlines an operation to conform to all <br /> governmental regulations. Additionally, the proposal is <br /> utilizing a new approach to extend the life of the present site <br /> for an additional 10 years. The proposal is as follows : <br /> 1. The first offer is based upon a ten-year lease agreement <br /> with the city of Lodi, whereby they agree to pay the <br /> City of Lodi $1. 00 per year to conduct a sanitary <br /> �5 <br />