Laserfiche WebLink
C <br />1 10. Availability of End Users for Diverted Material: <br />Material separated at a MRF would be sent to a <br />compost facility with end users as discussed <br />previously. <br />A more sophisticated system would produce a <br />higher grade compost that would be marketable to a <br />variety of end users, including City and County, <br />agricultural community, and homeowners. <br />V. Selection of Composting Program: <br />IA. Composting Alternatives Selected: <br />1. Source Separation: <br />In portions of the unincorporated area, <br />curbside separation and collection of yard waste <br />will be initiater� through changes in franchise <br />11 <br />agreements. <br />For self -haul waste, the County will provide <br />drop-off facilities at disposal sites and compost <br />facilities where generators may bring segregated <br />compostable waste. <br />This alternative was selected because of the <br />high percentage of yard waste in the residential <br />and self -haul waste streams. Source separation <br />would maximize the amount of yard waste diverted, <br />and would result in the cleanest material. <br />2. Compost Facilities: <br />Over the short-term and medium-term planning <br />period, two or three sites will be developed in the <br />Chapter 5 - Compost 19 <br />11 <br />