Laserfiche WebLink
R <br /> Monitoring Report Compliance Checklist 4 <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A RWQCB <br /> Reviewer Comment <br /> t. Is there a map showing the area X Closed Landfill <br /> and elevations in which filling has <br /> been completed during the past <br /> year and comparison to final <br /> closure contours? <br /> WDRs u. Is there a summary of the X <br /> Standard monitoring results indicating any <br /> Provisions changes made or observed since <br /> (1993,1997,2000, the previous annual report? <br /> 2003) <br /> v. Is there an evaluation of the X <br /> effectiveness of the leachate <br /> monitoring/control facilities? <br /> Standard w. Is there a discussion about the X <br /> Provisions annual LCRS testing and a <br /> (April 2000, comparison to earlier testing? <br /> Sept.2003)or <br /> check WDRs <br /> Violations Noted? (check one) Yes—X— No <br /> If Yes, check all issues that apply and provide comments: <br /> Comments (to be entered into CIWQS/Geotracker) <br /> Iricomplete transmittal letter Groundwater continues to be affected by LFG. Nine <br /> Incomplete report and ten VOCs were reported in well MW-5 during <br /> Inadequate monitoring program and 4th Quarter reports. Seven and six VOCs detected <br /> New release in well MW-8 during 3rd and 4th Quarter reports. LFG <br /> —X—Inadequate response to evidence of a release collection has been increased butgroundwater <br /> WDRs violation other than listed above contamination persists. PCE was reported in both <br /> Other(explain in comments) wells at concentrations that exceed the Public Health <br /> Goal of 0.06 !ag/L. Lack of closure cap over refuse <br /> discovered outside the WMU is likely source <br /> contributingto o impacts of shallow GW. <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: _ <br /> Date: ` �'- 2c)ltl <br />