ARCHIVED REPORTS_1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ATE u..&At9!j TWWKWAMCN AND KXWNQ AGENCY PM W DEPARTMENT P. (1076 L CHARTER WAY) VOCICTONB 1 ( May 7,1 1 10-9)49 1J4 10•Sj• City o! calumia Wasto Removal sysum DER SCH 0 Mr.Rua Colliau State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street Sacmnenlo,CA 93814 Dear Mr. Colliau: Thank you for the opportunity to review the Draft Envimnmental Impact Report regarding the ifornia ste Removal Systems expansion pro Utrans has the following co ena. • Pa 3 T-3,•mv 1989.90 s shown do not reflea 1989 or`90 volumes. From the South on State Route 99,33,000,31,000,and 38 (Average Daily Traffic) ADrs are shown. The correct figures are 42,OW,38,5W,and 49=mpectively,for 1990 Orellminary 1990"traffic Vol k), volumes shown for Sate Route 12 am about 3,000 ADT high. Page 40,Para h 2 -The L "A" Shown(stated)does not apply to State Routes 12 and 99, whether using the Figure T-3 volumes or corrected IM volumes. IM volume to capacity /C)ratios for to Route would be about 0.63 south of to Route 12 and 0.82 north of Turner Road. Thm V/Cs would equate to•'C"and 07 LOS,respectively. If the consultant intended to include State Route 99,it appears he/she incorrectly V/C ranges for signalized urban aMials as shown on Figure T,3,Page 41. V/C ranges am much different for • 1 y Capacity ). 1 L for Sate Route 12 a of State Route 99 would be about a"CO. • P A A T-7 do T-8 - The projectect volumes for the year 2000 and beyond,with or without the pw1w,an lower than the current volumes for State Route . Disbict 10 projections based on ment trends( be nearly double the year 20M volumes shown(71AW vows 38,000south of State Route 12). ' The consultmWe Unear projections detailed in Appendix D am severdy flawedby IM Whkh w prior to the opening of 1-5 north of State Route 12 in the 1983 volumes which were 11,000low than 1978. District 10 is currently OPODO,65 , southand 80,OW for the to no is of State Route 99 for r 2 projections an reasonably ate,the exists four-lane y will become ectre congested by the