Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br /> y 71 <br /> a P ,Figures T-9 - rhe State Route 12/Cluff Avenue Intersection win <br /> become a problem area with northeast buildout, with or without the OEM pro This will <br /> require InW9eftA treatment as sugested in the last panqpph on P =improvement <br /> Should Include -tum poduft on all lop,possible risht-turn only lanes on Some legs,and four <br /> throush-I&Mon State Route 12 seat to at least Guild Avenue. This likely five-la (2-way <br /> i )section on Stats Route 12 will requin all widening on the south side of the <br /> existing roadway because of the S.M.R.on the north. <br /> • Thee is no analysis of the State Route 12/Guild Avenue intersection included in the D <br /> will SUMM that this in on will also require future improvements for the cumulative <br /> General Plan dont,and Should be add (at last discussed)in this DEM <br /> • Pa ",last paragraph d Appendix lost - O s b t i <br /> en <br /> establish a mechanism to assess an equitable "fair share of future roadway in ro ts <br /> r or tine d tin this northeast a on rojec"traffic <br /> d T7,T9 <br /> and T-10,a share to provide a " -D" LOS for <br /> Its traffic only would be about 6%. This"fair Share Should be applied to the cost of upgrading <br /> State Route 12 to Ave lanes east to Guild Avenue,intersection improvements at Cluff am Guild <br /> Avenues,and the cost of an added Im in each direction on State Route 99 for some reasonable <br /> distance north o(the point of access at the Turner Road interchange. Only State Hi way <br /> System(SM Improvements are sugMted here in Caltrans,District UYs comments. <br /> We look forward to the receipt of the Final Environmental Impact port when it is finalized. If <br /> you have questions reprding these comments.I can be reached at the above-noted telephone number. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> L'2�z 4 <br /> ALJOHNSONJ�� <br /> IGR coordinatm <br /> Attachment <br />