ARCHIVED REPORTS_2014 NOV TPR - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Consolidated lForwar. .ic. Landfill Page 4 (FAA)and Stockton Metropolitan Airport to mitigate lighting impacts that could be caused by the proposed project. B. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 3(B.1) Proposed as Part of the Project: The County has determined that the applicant shall contribute their fair share of the signal installation at the intersection of Austin Ro"ariposa Road. A previous study(Austin Road Landfill EER, 1999)identifies a mitigation measure-that included the applicant's contribution to the installation of a traffic signal at Austin Road/Mariposa Road. This is included in existing permit requirements and is assumed to occur as part of baseline conditions. 4 (B.2) Identifted in This ETR: The project applicant shall contribute$3,768.84 toward the signal installation at Austin Road/Arch Road. The applicant shall contribute S4,696.67 to the signal installation at the intersection of Austin Road/French Camp Road. S(B.6) Identified in This ETR: The applicant shall contribute a fair share to the required addition of a second eastbound-to- southbound left turn lane to Austin Road that would be required to improve intersection operations to acceptable levels. The improvement includes the addition of a second eastbound-to-southbound left turn lane at the intersection of Mariposa Road/Austin Road. With the recommended improvement,the intersection would operate at LOS B with a V/C ratio of 0.686 during the PM peak hour. C,NOISE 6 (C.3) Identified in This FOR. (a)Heavy equipment operations shall not be conducted within 1500 feet of any occupied residence after 10 p.m.and before 6 a.m.;or (b)Equipment operations within 1500 feet of any residence after 10 p.m.or before 6 a.m. shall be fully shielded from the direct line of sight to the residence by an earthen berm whose crown elevation exceeds the elevation of the top of the exhaust stack. 7 Forward 1993(E3) The landowner and tenant at RI(residence at 9690 Mustin Road)shall be provided with the option of requesting a sound wall to reduce noise exposure both in the front yard and within the home. Table 1U..E.B in the Draft EIR shows the noise reduction provided by a variety of different sound wall designs. The footnotes to Table III.E.B describes the alternative designs in detail). Note that any of these designs will be more than sufficient to reduce project noise impacts below a level ofsignificance. 8 Forward 1993(EI)