Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE I.D.2. SUMMARY <br /> DAILY TONNAGE TRANSFER DESIGN CAPACITY VERSUS"HIGH"PROJECTED GATE QUANTITIES (1) <br /> Design Capacity Average Throughput Peaks Average in 5 years <br /> year 1995 1995 1995 2010 1995 2010 2000 <br /> 45 sec/veh 30 sec/veh. <br /> Non-Automated 328 394 (2) 160 226 280 396 192 <br /> Automated 992 926 3 373 528 560 792 448 <br /> Total Station 1,320 1,320 (4) 533 754 840 1,187 640 <br /> NOTES <br /> 1. The quantities in the Table are based on calculation sheets in Appendix B. Information sources and assumtions are with the calculations. The <br /> design capacity figure are highlighted in"TABLE I.D.2-DESIGN';and the other throughput quantities are highlighted in"TABLE I.D.2.b. Peak". <br /> 2. The capacity of Non-Automated Disposal under production of 45 seconds per vehicle at the gate is based on constraints of gate vehicle processing. <br /> The County has tested the new proposed computer system at 30 seconds per vehicle. Under 30 second gate processing,design capacity <br /> of Non-Automated Disposal is limited by theoretical unloading times. <br /> 3. Commercial design capacity is assumed to be limited by the ability to transfer total Station incoming waste stream from the tipping floor. The <br /> assumed total transfer capacity is 120 tons per hour for 11 hours. Under the transfer limitation,commercial capacity as shown is the <br /> difference between public design capacity and transfer capacity of 1,320 TPD. (Actual design capacity of cord gate and tipping <br /> processing is approximately 1,959 TPD). <br /> 4. The transfer capacity shown is based on 10 minutes per 20 ton transfer load. The actual total Station capacity will additionally include <br /> amounts which are recycled. Total Station capacity can be enhanced as needed in the future by increasing transfer operation hours <br /> and/or increased mechnization. <br /> d:\mju\lts\cak:\wasac9l(cella291) rev.8/19/93 <br />