Laserfiche WebLink
d <br />MAR Oo 'e6 22.40 EXCEL` H/5E <br />i <br />P,7 <br />L'A Econo Station EXCEIrTECH <br />March 6, 1986 <br />Page 5 <br />Project No. 2419D <br />` rate was reduced to 26 gpm. The length of <br />the actual pumping test was <br />terminated at 721 minutes (approximately 12 <br />hours) when the test pump <br />intake broke suction. <br />The test well (MW -14) displayed a sharp drawdown of 5 feet, through the <br />initial part of the test. Total drawdown of 12 <br />feet was observed at test <br />termination. <br />Drawdown observations were conducted in 6 <br />wells (MW -B, MW -9, MW -10, <br />v, MW -11, and well points WP -1, and WP -2) (see <br />Figure 1). Total drawdowns <br />of 4.28 and 3.27 feet were observed in nearby <br />well points WP -1 and WP -2. <br />Observation points MW -9 and MW -10 contained <br />drawdowns of 3.81 and 2.38 <br />feet, respectively. The total observed drawd)wn in the most distant <br />observation well (MW -8) was 1.89 feet. <br />3.3 Recovery Tesf <br />A recovery test is typically performed at the <br />end of a constant -discharge <br />test for a nominal time period (usually 60 <br />to 435 minutes). Recovery <br />observations were recorded, following termination of the constant -discharge <br />" test, in each of. the 6 monitoring points and in <br />pumping well MW -14. The <br />duration of the recovery test spanned 543 minutes (9 hours). All of the <br />observation points recovered to within 95% of <br />initial conditions during the <br />recovery period. <br />