Laserfiche WebLink
Oscrept bac Page 11 <br /> from crevices along bottom of the fire break. It was suspected <br /> that burning tires, which were buried by the construction of the <br /> embankment, had not been completely smothered and continued to <br /> smolder. It was assumed that the fire was isolated from the <br /> landfill by the deep trench that was dug between the ramp and <br /> landfill . The trench had been previously flooded, backfilled and <br /> compacted with native soil . The second fire broke out in a small <br /> side canyon where no burial of tires had been reported by the <br /> Choperena family. The side canyon was separated from the landfill <br /> by a natural ridge . <br /> August 29, 1996 <br /> The CIWMB in conjunction with EPA organized an interagency <br /> meeting at the CDF Fire Station in Mendota, CA. The purpose of <br /> the meeting was to discuss the status of current removal actions <br /> and future remedial actions at the site. The meeting was attended <br /> by the EPA Federal On-Scene Coordinator, Cal-EPA Integrated Waste <br /> Management Board and their contractor, Sukut Construction, Inc . , <br /> Cal-EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control, California <br /> Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, California Department <br /> of Fish & Game, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, <br /> Fresno County Health Agency and the California Department of <br /> Water Resources . <br /> The agencies were paricularly concerned with the potential <br /> for discharge of highly contaminated runoff from the ash into <br /> Little Panoche Creek. There was some urgency due to the approach <br /> of the rainy season. A significant rainfall event in the canyon <br /> would pose a major threat to the environment, fish and wildlife. <br /> The goal during the meeting was to determine how to remediate the <br /> site within the constraints of time and resources . It was agreed <br /> that EPA, with support from CDF, would finish the fire <br /> suppression effort . The CIWMB would undertake remedial actions <br /> once the fire was out and the area had cooled. The remedial work <br /> would be conducted under the direction of EPA and in accordance <br /> with their removal authorities and the NCP. The CIWMB and EPA <br /> proposed to remediate the site by reconsolidating the <br /> contaminated soil and ash to the upper regions of the canyon, <br /> placing a compacted, low permeable soil cover over the ash, <br /> constructing drainage structures, a larger retention basin and <br /> check dam, and providing erosion control for the site . The <br /> proposed action was verbally agreed upon by all the agencies . <br /> September 12 , 1996 <br /> An Action Memo and funding increase request was approved to <br /> continue the removal action. The increase raised the total <br /> project ceiling from $200K to $340K. <br />