Laserfiche WebLink
;g 1 _ <br /> ME <br /> rte. <br /> J. H. K!E1NF'ELDER&ASSOCIATES <br /> File: W-2006-1 <br /> December 16, 1985 <br /> r Page 10 <br /> i ' <br /> The monitoring wells were resampled on November 15, 1985. <br /> i <br /> The water samples were analyzed for EPA 602 compounds <br /> (aromatic hydrocarbons). Gasoline related constituents <br /> 2�- FSU b <br /> (benzene .22 ppm, toluene -I I� ��ppm, xylene .88 ppm and <br /> total hydrocarbons 1.8 pm) were detected in the ground <br /> -- water sample from monitoring well MW-1 . Low <br /> - concentrations of benzene were detected in the sample <br /> �r <br /> from MW-3 (.0045 ppm). Benzene was not detee'ted in MW-4; <br /> however, the detection limit was 0.0013 ppm due to <br /> interferences found in this sample. A1 ]. of the other <br /> constituents were below detectable limits in the samples <br /> from MW-3 and MW-4. All of the constituents were below <br /> dectectable limits in the water sampled collected from <br /> 1 <br /> MW-2. <br /> Three water samples from the on-site production well were <br /> collected on October 15, 1985 and October 1(;, 1985 during <br /> the conduct of the 24-hour pump test. The samples were <br /> i analyzed for EPA 602 compounds (aromatic hydrocarbons), <br /> General Minerals, and Inorganics. All of the <br /> constituents in the 602 Analysis were below detectable <br /> limits. All of the constituents were below detectable. <br /> limits or state action level in the <br /> __general_-mineral--and- <br /> w. ., <br /> inorganic analysis. Table 3 presents the results of the <br /> t <br />