Laserfiche WebLink
K Grindstone Joe Association <br />N Flood Determination & Impacts <br />San Joaquin County <br />April 7, 2020 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />database query at the Project location shows that the only maps available from the BAM Website at the Project <br />Location are the FEMA effective FIRMS. Thus, the CVFPB does not have a Designated Floodway at this location <br />and does not qualify as within the floodway under definition (3), unless the CVFPB has provided the County with <br />maps not available to the public. <br />The Project location does not meet the definition of a Floodway for definition (4). While the project location is <br />located between the levees adjacent to Little Potato Slough and not at or above the special flood hazard area <br />(SFHA) elevation (9 feet NAVD) it is not the watercourse itself. There is no FEMA or State Reclamation Board <br />(now known as the CVFPB) designated floodway at this location. <br />Definition (5) would require a determination from the County's Floodplain Administrator. <br />Definition (1) is typically determined through hydraulic modeling. Understanding how these models calculate <br />water surface elevations (and Floodways), the Project is extremely unlikely to cause a measurable increase in <br />water surface elevations, let alone rise to a one -foot increase and based upon the changes in volume and cross <br />sectional area, it is highly likely to cause a decrease in regulatory elevations (though not at a measurable scale). <br />Floodways are calculated by "filling" the regulatory floodplain until the water surface elevation has increased by <br />one -foot from the regulatory (or 100 -year) water surface. In a one-dimensional modeling scheme, the conveyance <br />areas are reduced from the fringes towards the main channel until a difference of one foot has been achieved <br />between the regulatory and the "encroached" model. A similar approach can be undertaken in some two- <br />dimensional models, though volume tends to be more critical than a cross sectional area reduction in those <br />schemes. The type of model described in the FIS for the Project area is typically either a one-dimensional/two- <br />dimensional dynamically coupled hydraulic models or two-dimensional hydraulic models. Both potential schemes <br />and their impacts are described later in this letter. <br />In evaluating the project specific topographic changes along with existing site information, the below metrics <br />were developed. It should be noted that based upon past experience, the Delta Hydro -dynamic model is not <br />available for public use, however, typical values modeling grid cells were assumed. From a hydraulic analysis <br />point of view, the project consists of two main components: the removal of the existing above -grade wastewater <br />holding tanks and the installation of a single sub -grade wastewater holding tank. <br />One existing wastewater holding tank is a 10.25 foot diameter, ground supported tank; the remaining four tanks <br />were approximately five foot long by four foot wide, by 3 foot high. The existing tanks are completely above <br />grade and will be removed as part of this project. The proposed single wastewater holding tank is entirely <br />subgrade. However, to ensure it is properly anchored and compliant with County code, one foot of fill will be <br />placed above grade (see previously provided Project plan sets). <br />Typical ground elevations were obtained by reviewing available USGS LiDAR2 at the project site. The project <br />site ground elevations range from 6-7 feet above NAVD (or two to three feet below the base flood elevation). <br />A cross section was drawn from the crowns of the levees adjacent to Little Potato Slough and through the project <br />location to determine the approximate cross-sectional area. The approximate extents of demolition and <br />construction for the site were measured from aerial imagery and the minimal amount of grid cells needed to model <br />the project location was determined using an assumed 25 -foot by 25 -foot grid cell (a typical grid cell size used in <br />two-dimensional modeling). The characteristics of the project were then compared against the larger location <br />2 USGS LiDAR Collected in 2017 under Task Order G16PD01047 <br />