Laserfiche WebLink
sanitary sewer system is a prerequisite to annexing. Also, in discussions <br /> with the City of Manteca Public Works Department, supplying City water <br /> to these residences could take no less that 9 — 12 months. Obviously a <br /> temporary solution is required to provide water in less than the time to . <br /> fulfill Option I. The cost to perform Option I would be significant, a n d <br /> funding at this time is not allocated. In light of these issues, Option I is <br /> not a feasible solution to this urgent matter. However, ASE strongly <br /> recommends that Option I remain the ultimate goal for the long-term <br /> solution of the potable water situation. <br /> Onto <br /> This option allows for the destruction of the affected wells a n d <br /> installation of new wells in a non-polluted aquifer. The hydrocarbon <br /> plume affecting the domestic and irrigation wells north of the subject site <br /> has not been completely defined as of this date. Without a complete <br /> hydrogeologic interpretation of the entire plume, drilling and installing <br /> deeper wells at this time may prove to be a poor and costly decision. In <br /> fact, it is possible that drilling deeper wells could impact the aquifer in a <br /> negative manner; cross contaminating previously non-contaminated <br /> zones. Option II would also be extremely costly; requiring thirteen ( 13) <br /> new wells and subsequent destructions of the existing wells. ASE believes <br /> this would be a poor use of the limited remediation funding, especially <br /> when Option I, the logical solution, is put in place thereby making the <br /> wells obsolete. <br /> Option ITT option consists of a water treatment system, likely activated carbon, <br /> installed at each affected well head to treat the contaminated water prior <br /> to its delivery into the residences. This option requires (a) significant up- <br /> front expenditures for equipment and installation, (b) frequent sample <br /> collection and analyses to assure proper operation of the system, and (c) <br /> frequent maintenance on the system. ASE therefore does not recommend <br /> this option. <br /> Option IV <br /> This option consists of portable, potable water tanks set on the property <br /> of each affected residence, piped to their house plumbing, which will be <br /> maintained with a constant supply of potable water using a tanker-truck <br /> filled by a nearby City of Manteca fire hydrant. This is ASE's <br /> recommended "interim solution" to the domestic and irrigation well <br /> situation. ASE recommends this option for several reasons: (a) it can be <br /> put in place in a very short amount of time (less than 4 weeks), (b) the <br /> up-front expenditure is reasonable in comparison to the other options, <br /> Proposal #2000-152 for Potable Water Systems, Frank's One Stop Property, Manteca, CA <br /> -2- <br />