Laserfiche WebLink
ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY COMPLAINT ORDER NO.R5-2005-0528 -4- <br /> RODNEY AND GAYLA SCHATZ <br /> MOKELUMNE RIM VINEYARDS <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 2004, 5 May 2005, and 21 July 2005). None of the workplans were complete, satisfactorily <br /> addressed staff's comments, or contained the information listed in the WDRs. A 12 September <br /> 2005 letter from Mokelumne Rim Vineyards states, "I have addressed the test well issue. Please <br /> indicate where your office would like them to be placed." An acceptable workplan was recently <br /> submitted on 20 October 2005, which is 502 days late. <br /> 10. WDRs Provision G.Ld required submittal of a Land Application Area Improvement Report <br /> (LAAIR) by 13 July 2004. The LAAIR was required to show that adequate containment exists <br /> surrounding the land application area, so that wastewater will not leave the area permitted for <br /> discharge. A report was submitted on 14 February 2005 which states: "A levee will be used if <br /> necessary on the west boundary, east of the railroad tracks." This statement indicates that a <br /> containment berm does not exist surrounding the land application area. To date, an adequate report <br /> has not been received. <br /> 11. WDRs Provision G.Le required submittal of an Operation and Management Plan (O&M Plan) by <br /> 13 July 2004. The 10 February 2005 O&M Plan that was submitted is inadequate because it does <br /> not address most of the items described in Provision G.l.e of the WDRs. To date, an adequate <br /> report has not been received. <br /> 12. WDRs Provision G.Lf required submittal of a Groundwater Well Installation Report of Results by <br /> 15 September 2004. Until 20 October 2005, a complete monitoring well installation workplan had <br /> not been submitted. As of this date, the wells have not been installed and the well installation <br /> report has not been submitted. <br /> 13. WDRs Provision G.Lg required submittal of a Salinity Reduction Study by 5 April 2005. The <br /> report has not been submitted. <br /> REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS <br /> 14. By the acts and omissions cited in the Findings above,the Discharger has violated WDRs Order <br /> No. R5-2004-0035, which requires that all technical and monitoring reports be submitted pursuant <br /> to CWC Section 13267. <br /> 15. CWC Section 13268 (a) states: "Any person failing or refusing to furnish technical or monitoring program <br /> reports as required by subdivision(b)of Section 13267, or failing or refusing to furnish a statement of compliance as <br /> required by subdivision(b)of Section 13399.2,or falsifying any information provided therein,is guilty of a <br /> misdemeanor and may be liable civilly in accordancewith subdivision(b)." <br /> 16. CWC Section 13268(b)(1) states: "Civil liability may be administratively imposed by a regional board in <br /> accordance with Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 13323)of Chapter 5 for a violation of subdivision(a)in an <br /> amount which shall not exceed one thousand dollars($1,000)for each day in which the violation occurs." <br /> 17. CWC Section 13350(e) states: "The state board or a regional board may impose civil liability administratively <br /> pursuant to Article 2.5(commencing with Section 13323)of Chapter 5 either on a daily basis or on a per gallon basis, <br />