Laserfiche WebLink
Antonia Vorster -2- 7 January 1988 <br /> 2. I disagree with the statement that McCormick & Baxter' s discharge has no <br /> "measurable effect" on SRWCF operations. If the SRWCF sludge is determined <br /> to be a hazardous or designated waste due to constituents contributed by MB's <br /> discharge, this will potentially result in significant impacts regarding <br /> sludge disposal requirements. <br /> 3. The contention that tetrachlorinated phenols detected at the SRWCF are not <br /> the result of MB' s discharge should be supported by actual sampling and <br /> analysis results. <br /> GAR:ej <br /> pu <br />