Laserfiche WebLink
identified during the sorting process at the Sacramento Reclamation Center as potentially <br /> hazardous waste is segregated pursuant to the Waste Management Guidelines. The <br /> Company utilizes a third-party environmental subcontractor which makes the final <br /> determination as to whether a specific item sorted as potentially hazardous waste is <br /> actually a non-hazardous regulated waste or a hazardous waste. For material determined <br /> to be hazardous waste, the Company's contractor completes the appropriate manifest and <br /> the Company then reviews the manifest and signs the manifest. The contractor then ships <br /> the hazardous waste material for disposal at the licensed Treatment Storage and/or <br /> Disposal Facility. Please see Exhibit 102, are copies of the company's Waste <br /> Management Guidelines and sorting procedure provided to the reclamation personnel. As <br /> such, the company's cross docking and reclamation process complies with all applicable <br /> regulations relative to hazardous waste. <br /> Item 104: No emergency coordinator. <br /> Response: The remarks contained in the inspection report for Item 104 are incorrect and <br /> therefore the Company disputes this allegation. The facility has an assigned emergency <br /> coordinator which is identified every year during the annual training. Please see Exhibit <br /> 104. In addition, the Emergency Information Sheet was posted near phones and at <br /> various areas in the warehouse. <br /> Item 105: Failed to train employees on waste handling and emergency procedures. <br /> Response: The remarks contained in the inspection report for Item 105 are incorrect and <br /> therefore the Company disputes this violation. As per company policy, the Company <br /> provides employees who handle hazardous waste proper training. Please see Exhibit <br /> 105, which is a list of attendance for the previous training as well as training materials, <br /> sign in sheets and additional materials that were reviewed with the facility during <br /> subsequent "Workshop" training sessions. <br /> Item 109: Failed to keep signed copy of manifests from the designated facility for three <br /> years. <br /> Response: The remarks contained in the inspection report for Item 109 are incorrect and <br /> therefore the Company disputes this violation. Stockton Logistics maintains copies of <br /> manifests and they are readily available for inspection either at the site or by request to <br /> the corporate office. While readily available, the individual who was present at the <br /> inspection failed to locate or request assistance in locating such manifests pursuant to <br /> company practice. Please see Exhibit 109, TSDF copies for the seven specific hazardous <br /> waste manifests listed. The facility is maintaining these in a binder onsite, with a backup <br /> electronic copy. <br /> Item 110: Failed to comply with manifest exception requirements. M <br /> =Z <br /> Response: The remarks contained in the inspection report for Item 110 are incorrect aaC <br /> therefore the Company disputes this violation. Stockton Logistics did comply with Y, m <br /> manifest exception requirements and retained copies of all manifests signed off by the n <br /> destination facility and such manifests were readily available for review either at the sits; <br /> or by request to the corporate office. While readily available, the individual who was °Z o <br /> present at the inspection failed to locate or request assistance in locating the manifests a D <br />