My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2201
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0527808
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2021 11:16:36 AM
Creation date
5/4/2021 10:15:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0527808
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0018851
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON-ROUGH & READY ISLAND
STREET_NUMBER
2201
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14503001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2201 WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The anticipated amount of tax increment for the Project Area would be <br />sufficient for the Agency to invest in a modest amount infrastructure, public <br />facility, commercial rehabilitation, and economic development projects. As <br />with any redevelopment project, the Agency will be working closely with the <br />private sector so these tax increment revenue investments can be leveraged <br />for the most effective impact on Project Area blight. Long term, it is the intent <br />of the Agency that its redevelopment activities will stimulate others to invest <br />in the Project Area as well. <br />Reasons for the Provisions of Tax Increment <br />Tax increment financing will be an essential component of a successful <br />redevelopment program in the Project Area. As demonstrated in Section B of <br />this Report, many of the Project Area blighting conditions are attributed to a <br />lack of financial incentives for new development and property rehabilitation. <br />Market values and development constraints have prevented maintenance <br />investments resulting in physical decay. <br />Historically, assistance from federal government has not been an adequate to <br />fund projects to significantly alleviate blighting conditions. Also, with the <br />recent state budget deficit, state assistance in providing funding for <br />necessary public infrastructure improvements and facilities cannot be <br />reasonably expected. While there are other means to raise public funds <br />without tax increment financing, these techniques would ultimately result in <br />higher taxes or increased development costs, both of which are <br />counterproductive to resolving the unique issues in the Project Area. For <br />example, certain public improvements could be financed by creating an <br />assessment district, but the property owners would probably not support <br />creation of the district because many cannot afford the cost of additional <br />taxes (two-thirds of the voters must approve formation of such a district). <br />Tax increment financing provides a dedicated source of revenues for the <br />Agency to invest into housing and other redevelopment programs, without <br />burdening property owners or residents with additional costs that they cannot <br />afford. <br />ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON <br />MAY 3, 2004 <br />ROUGH AND READY ISLAND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT <br />- C-6 - PRELIMINARY REPORT
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.