My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1992-1993
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
14750
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440007
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1992-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2021 4:34:37 PM
Creation date
5/7/2021 8:39:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1992-1993
RECORD_ID
PR0440007
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0000595
FACILITY_NAME
HARNEY LANE LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
14750
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06503006
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
14750 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Data from the first two sampling events of the perimeter gas monitoring <br /> network indicate the presence of methane gas in excess of compliance levels <br /> at the facility boundary. It now appears that a gas control system will be <br /> necessary pursuant to (17783.15 O(5)). Do the Closure and Postclosure Plans <br /> need revision to account for the specifics of a gas control system and its <br /> associated costs? <br /> 4. San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division did not receive a letter of <br /> CEGA compliance from the Governor's Office of Planning and Research <br /> referenced in response to comment #30 in the January 28, 1992 letter to Kim <br /> Schwab from Tom Horton. Also, item #3 of the Notice of Determination for <br /> this project states that mitigation measures were made a condition of project <br /> approval. What are these mitigation measures and where are they addressed? <br /> 5. Why is it that two of the existing gas probes that were scheduled for <br /> decommissioning could not be located and hence were not destroyed? <br /> Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Jerry <br /> Wickes at (209) 468-3459. <br /> V <br /> Fred Kaufma , Program Manager <br /> Environmental Health Division <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.