Laserfiche WebLink
6 0 Page 1 of 1 <br /> Natalia Subbotnikova [EH] <br /> From: Gebrehawariat, Tadese [tgebrehawariat@CIWMB.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:20 PM <br /> To: Karl, Christine <br /> Cc: Natalia Subbotnikova [EH]; Robert McClellon [EH]; Poulson, Zane <br /> Subject: North County Landfill <br /> Hi All — Last Friday (July 18) Natalia and 1 conducted an inspection at the subject site. The landfill <br /> (MRF and Chipping and Grinding) operations were all good and the LEA is doing a good job at <br /> communicating the requirements. I observed a good interaction between the site operations <br /> supervisors and the LEA. <br /> As indicate above, there are three different operations at the site. There is a landfill operation, an <br /> operation of a MRF, and a chipping and grinding operation. All are under the SWFP and JTD for the <br /> landfill. I noticed in the LEA's latest inspection report for June 2008, there was a citation for a dust <br /> control issue at the MRF. The LEA was, I believe, citing Section 20800, which is from Title 27. There <br /> may not have been any dust control issues at the landfill at the time of the LEA's inspection but that is <br /> all the LEA could do to communicate the issue to the operator. <br /> In my inspection report, I am recommending that you all work together to make the necessary changes <br /> to make it possible for the LEA to inspect each of the three operations, applying the appropriate SMS <br /> on each operation, and generating three inspection reports using the appropriate inspection forms for <br /> each, for the multiple activities at the site. <br /> Thanks for your consideration of the matter. <br /> 7/22/2008 <br />