COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0 down the sump lids on the 20,000-gallon diesel tanks to make them vapor tight, and a reportable release statement was not submitted. All other violations on the October 30, 2008, UST inspection were adequately addressed. The statement addressing the December 22, 2008, UST inspection indicated the inspection date was December 23, 2008, and still incorrectly indicated that the leak in the UDC sump 16A/17B was due to a faulty flex hose connection. A reportable release statement for this leak and maintenance and monitoring records were not submitted. The December 22, 2008, monitoring system certification test report for the automobile side of the facility and a retest report for the components that previously failed on October 30, 2008, were submitted. All other violations on the December 22, 2008, UST inspection were adequately addressed. On October 19, 2009, Ms. Thuy Tran, Environmental Health Specialist, EHD, and Ms. Henry were on site to witness the annual monitoring system certification, leak detector testing, and spill container testing of the truck stop side of the facility. Ms. Tran performed a routine UST inspection and found diesel leaking from dispenser 14A/15B above the shear valve, and the UDC sump contained approximately one inch of diesel. Approximately one gallon of liquid was found in each of the two diesel piping sumps, and smaller amounts were found in all the other diesel UDC sumps. During a review of the facility's UST paperwork, Ms. Tran noted that annual permit fees were still not paid and the facility was operating without a valid permit for 2009. The monitoring plan was not current, the three alarms noted in the alarm history log did not have corresponding maintenance records for review, and an alarm on March 5, 2009, was not noted in the facility's alarm history or the designated operator's monthly inspection report. The October and November 2008 designated operator monthly inspection reports were not found on site. The automatic tank gauges were not tested, and a test report was submitted that incorrectly states that the tank gauging equipment was used only for inventory purposes and not leak detection monitoring (Attachment 24). An inspection report was mailed to Fast Lane Central Valley, LLC, in Healdsburg, CA (Attachment 25). Photos taken during the inspection (Attachment 26) and the monitoring panel alarm history prior to this day's testing are attached (Attachment 27). On October 19, 2009, Ms. Henry performed a routine hazardous waste inspection (Attachment 28) and found that a 55-gallon drum and a 30-gallon drum of hazardous waste were not marked with their respective hazardous properties. The 30-gallon drum also did not have an accumulation start date. During a review of the facility's hazardous waste paperwork, uniform manifests for the disposal of hazardous waste and disposal records for universal waste were not found on site. The modified contingency plan and emergency coordinator information on site were not current. On October 26, 2009, Ms. Henry sent a list of free training classes offered at the EHD to the facility by fax (Attachment 29). On November 18, 2009, the Return to Compliance statement and supporting documentation were submitted in response to the October 19, 2009, UST and hazardous waste inspection reports (Attachment 30). Modified contingency plan and emergency coordinator information, monitoring plan, and a reportable release document were submitted. The statement indicated that they do not have records of the October and November 2008 designated operator monthly inspection reports and that a manifest was attached, but no manifest was found. It also noted that the fuel found in the 6