COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

14A/15B UDC sump was due to a break in the flex hose connection, which was incorrect, since photos taken during the inspection shows diesel leaking from the dispenser itself. Walton Engineering, Inc. was hired to investigate the source of fuel in the piping sumps. Maintenance records not found during the routine UST inspection were not submitted. On November 23, 2009, Ms. Henry called Mr. Gill and told him that not all of the violations were addressed. Mr. Gill stated he did not have the paperwork in front of him so Ms. Henry did not review each violation in detail. Ms. Henry reminded Mr. Gill that permit fees were still not paid and they do not have a permit to operate. Ms. Henry also pointed out that the monitoring plan submitted had errors, and Mr. Gill stated that was all the information he had but would check with Walton Engineering. Ms. Henry asked when she could expect the remaining issues to be corrected, and Mr. Gill replied that since it was a short week, maybe the following week. Ms. Henry reminded Mr. Gill that the monitoring system certification for the automobile side of the facility was not done yet and would be a billable inspection. On December 2, 2009, Ms. Henry returned a call from Mr. Gill and asked him about the overdue annual permit fees. Mr. Gill stated they have been paid, and he had a cancelled check from the EHD. Ms. Henry stated that it may have been for the food permit and gave Mr. Gill the EHD Accounting Office telephone number. Mr. Gill stated that Walton Engineering would be performing the monitoring system certification for the automobile side of the facility later this week, and Ms. Henry told him that nothing had been scheduled with the EHD. Ms. Henry asked when the remaining issues would be corrected and Mr. Gill stated that Walton Engineering was working on it. On December 28, 2009, Ms. Henry witnessed the annual monitoring system certification, leak detector testing, and spill container testing of the automobile side of the facility. Liquid was found in all the UDC sumps, the 8,000-gallon diesel UST fill and piping sumps, and the vent transition sump. The 87-octane piping sump interstitial sensor failed when tested and was replaced on site. Ms. Henry reviewed the facility's paperwork and found a December 21, 2009, work order from Walton Engineering that stated, "Dispenser 14 has a severe leak. Remove approx five gallons of fuel from the UDC." Ms. Henry asked to see the sumps at the truck stop side of the facility and found a visible leak at dispenser 14A/15B, and liquid in the piping sumps for both of the 20,000-gallon diesel USTs. The diesel leak detector at the automobile side could not be tested due to low fuel levels, and the 91-octane piping sump interstitial sensor did not come out of alarm after testing. The automatic tank gauges on the automobile side were tested, but the test report submitted incorrectly states that the tank gauging equipment was used only for inventory purposes and not leak detection monitoring (Attachment 31). The automatic tank gauges on the truck stop side were not tested. A current monitoring plan still had not been submitted. An inspection report was mailed to Fast Lane Central Valley, LLC, in Healdsburg, CA (Attachment 32). On December 28, 2009, Ms. Henry also performed a hazardous waste reinspection since all the violations found during the October 19, 2009, routine hazardous waste inspection were not corrected (Attachment 33). A 30-gallon drum of "diesel waste" was found labeled, but missing the hazardous properties and physical state. Records of universal waste disposal records were still not found on site. 7