My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006007
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINNE
>
3031
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600211
>
SU0006007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2022 3:57:41 PM
Creation date
7/7/2022 10:03:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0006007
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600211
STREET_NUMBER
3031
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LINNE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
APN
23920029
ENTERED_DATE
4/18/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
3031 W LINNE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
4/18/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Clifford & Louella Robertson <br /> 3458 W Linne Rd Au- <br /> Tracy, Ca 95304 00%, <br /> Re: Application : PA-0600211 by Raymond & Tami Garrison for paint ball reational facility <br /> April 18, 2006 <br /> To: San Joaquin County Community Development Department <br /> 1810 East Hazelton Ave <br /> Stockton, Ca 95205 <br /> We oppose the application for this recreational use in an agricultural zone. <br /> Linne Road is becoming more and more a busy road and does not need any additional traffic for recreational use. We <br /> own property across the road from this site and are already having problems with city people considering any open areas <br /> as being free for their use as a playground. Even though it is private property, they use it at will for tearing around on <br /> motorcycles and ATVs. Owners of agricultural property have great difficulty getting permits from the county for genuine <br /> agricultural uses. This proposed use would not in any way seem to fit in with agricultural use. <br /> We oppose this application for these reasons: <br /> Increased traffic on a road that has commutors and others traveling at high rates of speed. This would be especially <br /> dangerous for young people who would be expected to use this proposed facility. <br /> Non-ag use of property zoned agricultural. <br /> More invasion of privately owned property by those who would consider adjacent property free for their use for <br /> recreation. Farmers would take the blame by the public for more dust and smog polution. <br /> Signed <br /> �/' �t�'.lJ�_� <br /> Cliffo Robertson <br /> Louella Robertson <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.