Laserfiche WebLink
<br />aecom.com <br />Our Reference 60632236 <br />2/10 <br />Gold Bond contracted with American Environmental Management Corp. (AEMC) to remove the eight <br />USTs during the week of September 29, 1986 (AEMC 1986). The closure operations were permitted by <br />San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division (the County) and observed by <br />staff from the County and RWQCB. No staining was observed in the product tank pit, but a slight odor was <br />detected. Some staining and odor were observed in the waste tank pit. Post-removal sampling of soil from <br />the tank pits showed only low levels of five chemicals including toluene (at less than 0.1 milligrams per <br />kilogram) (AEMC 1986). <br />Concentrations of the chemicals detected in the soil samples collected from the tank pit were below <br />regulatory guidance levels for UST corrective action, indicating that soil removal was not necessary <br />(AEMC 1986). In January 1987, RWQCB and the County agreed that the tank pits could be backfilled. In <br />early 1988, California Department of Health Services (DHS) concluded the tank closure was complete and <br />deferred to the County to issue a certificate of closure to Gold Bond (DHS, Toxic Substances Control <br />Division, Northern California Section 1988). Dopaco vacated the Site in 1988 (Geosyntec 2015a). <br />In 1997, Newark (the new owner of the property) requested a closure letter from RWQCB for the eight <br />USTs removed in 1986 (Rogge MJ 1997). RWQCB responded in early 1998 stating that additional soil and <br />groundwater samples were required from the area of the former USTs to complete the closure request <br />(Anderson PA 1998). <br />No further activity with respect to closure of the former USTs occurred until 2005, when a soil and <br />groundwater investigation was performed by Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (AGE) on behalf of a <br />prospective buyer of the property (AGE 2005). In 2006 and 2008, MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, <br />Inc. (MACTEC) performed additional investigations in the area on behalf of Newark (MACTEC 2006; <br />2008). According to these investigations, soil and groundwater impacts were identified in the <br />northwestern, southwestern, and southeastern corners of the Site. In the northwestern area, toluene and <br />other petroleum compounds were identified in the deeper soil (15 feet bgs and deeper) and groundwater <br />(Geosyntec 2015a). <br />Between 2008 and 2012, soil vapor, soil, and groundwater samples were collected from beneath the plant <br />building, which was demolished in 2011, and near the northwestern exterior corner of the building. In <br />November 2012, Geosyntec installed three groundwater monitoring wells (DMW-1, DMW-3, and DMW-4) <br />screened across the A-zone sand (i.e., 30 to 40 feet bgs). Regular sampling of these wells commenced in <br />March 2013 (Geosyntec 2015a). <br />Removal of the secondary toluene source occurred from February 25 to February 27, 2014, during which <br />approximately 300 cubic yards of soil was excavated, stockpiled, profiled, and disposed of as non- <br />hazardous waste (Geosyntec 2015a). <br />In February 2014, following excavation of the secondary toluene source, Geosyntec installed groundwater <br />monitoring wells DMW-5A and DMW-5B adjacent to the excavation footprint. In May and June of 2014, <br />Geosyntec advanced two cone penetrometer test (CPT) borings, collected 12 grab groundwater samples, <br />and installed three groundwater monitoring wells (DMW-6A, DMW-6B, and DMW-6WT) off-site and <br />downgradient from the former toluene source area. Regular sampling of these wells commenced in June <br />2014 (Geosyntec 2015a). <br />Regular sampling of the eight Site groundwater monitoring wells continued through December 2014. <br />Based on the results of this monitoring and the off-site characterization, gasoline and diesel were added to <br />the list of potential contaminants of concern (COCs) for the Dopaco Area (Geosyntec 2015b). <br />Dopaco was acquired by Cascades Inc. (Cascades) in 2014. In January 2015, on behalf of Cascades, <br />Geosyntec submitted a Request for Closure for Toluene (Geosyntec 2015a). <br />In April 2015, RWQCB issued a letter of No Further Action Required for Toluene at the Site listed under <br />RWQCB Case Number (#) 391187 (aka Dopaco Case #1) (RWQCB 2015); however, all other COCs <br />detected in groundwater within the Dopaco Area during the toluene investigation were listed under