Laserfiche WebLink
Response to Written Comments Page 9 of 10 07 June 2023 <br /> Forward Landfill, Inc. <br /> COMMENT NO. 27: (Requirements Table 8, Pg 32). MSW should be allowed to be <br /> disposed in Class III WMUs. <br /> RESPONSE: Updated to correct reference. <br /> COMMENT NO. 28: (Requirements Table 8, Pg 33). Inert waste should be allowed to <br /> be disposed in Class III WMUs. <br /> RESPONSE: Table 8 has been updated to include inert waste to be allowed in <br /> Class III WMUs. <br /> COMMENT NO. 29: (Requirements Table 8, Pg 33). ACW should be allowed to be <br /> disposed in Class III WMUs. <br /> RESPONSE: Table 8 has been updated to include asbestos-containing waste <br /> (>1%) to be allowed in lined Class III WMUs. <br /> COMMENT NO. 30: (Requirements Table 8, Pg 33). TWW should be allowed to be <br /> disposed in appropriately lined Class III <br /> WMUs. <br /> RESPONSE: Table 8 has been updated to include treated wood waste to be <br /> allowed in lined Class III WMUs. <br /> COMMENT NO. 31: (Requirements B.6, Pg 35). Can leachate and LFG condensate <br /> from a WMU be discharged to other similarly lined WMUs? <br /> RESPONSE: Leachate and LFG condensate from a WMU can be discharged to <br /> other similarly lined WMUs if it is pre-approved in writing by the Central Valley <br /> Water Board. <br /> COMMENT NO. 32: (Requirements B.6, Pg 35). Can RWQCB comments be provided <br /> on September 3, 2021 submittal? <br /> RESPONSE: Board staff will be providing comments to the "Settlement Analysis <br /> for the Austin Unit" report submitted September 3, 2021. <br /> COMMENT NO. 33: (Requirements B.6, Pg 35). Arcadis to send most recent version of <br /> Figure 1 <br /> RESPONSE: Noted, Attachment D will be updated once Arcadis provides an <br /> updated Monitoring Network Map. <br /> COMMENT NO. 34: (Requirements B.6, Pg 35). The table should be titled sump and <br /> pan lysimeter; sump foundation layer should be 6-inch compacted soil <br />