Laserfiche WebLink
Executive Summary <br /> Level of <br /> Potential Impacts Significance Mitigation Measures <br /> i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of <br /> Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical <br /> resources as defined in Public Resources Code 5020.1(k)or <br /> ii) A resource determined by the lead agency in its discretion <br /> and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant <br /> pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (s)of Public <br /> Resources Code section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set <br /> forth in subdivision (c)of Public Resources Code 5024.1, as <br /> the CEQA lead agency, has considered the significance of <br /> the resource to a California Native American tribe. <br /> UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS <br /> IMPACT 4.17-1: Would the project require or result in the relocation or Less than Implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1 would be required. <br /> construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or Significant Impact <br /> storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or with Mitigation <br /> telecommunications facilities,the construction or relocation which Incorporated <br /> would cause significant environmental effects? <br /> IMPACT 4.17-2: Would the project have sufficient water supplies Less than No mitigation required. <br /> available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future Significant Impact <br /> development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years? <br /> IMPACT 4.17-3:Would the project result in a determination by the No Impact No mitigation required. <br /> wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project <br /> that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand <br /> in addition to the provider's existing commitments? <br /> IMPACT 4.17-4: Would the project generate solid waste in excess of Less than No mitigation required <br /> State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local Significant Impact <br /> infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste <br /> reduction goals? <br /> IMPACT 4.17-5:Would the project comply with federal, state, and No Impact No mitigation required. <br /> local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to <br /> solid waste? <br /> WILDFIRE <br /> IMPACT 4.18-1: If located in or near state responsibility areas or No Impact No mitigation required. <br /> lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,would the <br /> project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or <br /> emergency evacuation plan? <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project ES-30 Tetra Tech/SCH2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />