Laserfiche WebLink
Snyders Sanitary Garbage Disposal Site Page 2 <br /> SWIS No. 39-CR-0031 <br /> the Work Plan. This trenching will be used to determine if buried waste is present and to <br /> visually determine the nature and thickness of existing cover. No samples are proposed <br /> to be collected and the excavated material will be returned to its place of origin and <br /> compacted with the excavator's bucket. <br /> On March 20, 2024, the LEA requested assistance from CalRecycle to review the <br /> technical aspects of the document. The following comments are for your consideration: <br /> 1. Figure 4 shows the proposed exploratory trench locations which are based on <br /> information from a limited field investigation conducted in October 2002 (October <br /> 2002 Study) by Ninyo & Moore (provided as Attachment B in the Work Plan). It <br /> appears that the locations of the trenches somewhat align with the estimated <br /> extent of debris and/or refuse provided in Figure 1 of Attachment I with the <br /> following exceptions: <br /> a. Area between Trench Location 1 and the northern property boundary. <br /> b. Area along the southwestern corner near Trench Locations 26 and <br /> "ASH 1." <br /> The Work Plan should include trenching in these areas to fully delineate the <br /> extent of the waste shown in Attachment I. <br /> 2. The Work Plan states that trenching will be used to determine if buried waste is <br /> present but is unclear of how they will confirm the lateral and vertical limit of <br /> waste. Trenching should be used to find these limits of the waste by digging both <br /> laterally and vertically until native is discovered. It is our understanding that <br /> Figure 1 in Attachment I represent an "estimated" extent based on interpolations <br /> of the data only. The October 2002 Study did not fully delineate the waste extent. <br /> As such, the Work Plan should be revised to describe how trenching will continue <br /> until native soil is encountered both laterally and vertically on the property so a <br /> more accurate figure can be produced. <br /> 3. The Work Plan does not propose collecting any samples for laboratory analysis. <br /> Since the trenches are in different areas from the October 2002 Study, we <br /> suggest that the waste discovered be sampled for the following chemicals that <br /> were found in the October 2002 Study using the same methods: <br /> a. CAM 17 Metals <br /> b. Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) and STLC Deionized Water <br /> (STLC DI-WET) for specific Title 22 metals that exceeded 10 times their <br /> respective thresholds in accordance with federal and state hazardous <br /> waste criteria. <br /> c. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) by USEPA Method <br /> 6010/7471A for those samples containing the highest metal <br /> 1001 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 1 P.O. Box 4025, Sacramento, CA 95812 <br /> www.CaIRecycle.ca.gov 1 (916) 322-4027 <br />