My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FRENCH CAMP TURNPIKE
>
2546
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0547076
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2026 12:29:42 PM
Creation date
9/16/2025 2:40:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0547076
PE
2950 - ENVIRON ASSESS
FACILITY_ID
FA0026694
FACILITY_NAME
2546 FRENCH CAMP PHASE II
STREET_NUMBER
2546
STREET_NAME
FRENCH CAMP TURNPIKE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
165261260
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
2546 FRENCH CAMP TURNPIKE STOCKTON 95206
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
263
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Soil Vapor Sampling Methodology <br /> • Gas sampling will be performed by hydraulically pushing soil gas probes to depths specified in the <br /> table above. <br /> • Dedicated vapor probes will be sampled at depths specified in the table above at specified areas of <br /> concern. Vapor samples will be collected into Tedlar bags or Summa canisters using a peristaltic <br /> pump, Teflon tubing, and a Masterflex tubing. <br /> • Use of a peristaltic pump will ensure that sampled air does not circulate through a pump, causing <br /> potential cross contamination and leakage. <br /> • All tubing will be discarded between sampling locations to eliminate the possibility of cross <br /> contamination. <br /> • Sample flow rate will be set from 0.5 to 1 liters per minute and measured using a flow meter. <br /> • Tedlar bags or Summa canisters used for sample collection will be analyzed by a state-certified <br /> laboratory, using a field-based gas chromatograph. <br /> • Soil vapor sampling will be conducted in accordance with DTSC Vapor Intrusion Guidance (2011a). <br /> Reporting <br /> Detectable results of soil matrix, soil vapor, and groundwater sampling will be compared to the San <br /> Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board's (SFBRWQCB) Environmental Screening Levels <br /> (ESLs) published in January 2019 and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Human and <br /> Ecological Risk Office (HERO) issued an updated Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) Note No. 3 in <br /> June 2020. In this note, DTSC makes recommendations regarding the methodology and use of the U.S. <br /> EPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) and DTSC-modified screening levels (jointly referred to herein as <br /> "DTSC Recommended SLs")for soil vapor screening under residential and commercial/industrial land use <br /> scenarios. <br /> The above screening levels were developed as tools to screen sites to evaluate the need for additional <br /> action in the form of additional assessment or evaluation. The screening levels are based on <br /> conservative levels derived from assessment of potential exposure pathways to the most sensitive <br /> property use. The screening levels are not default cleanup goals. For this property, comparison of <br /> detected contaminants in soil vapor with screening levels will be utilized to evaluate the human health <br /> risk from possible vapor intrusion under a commercial use scenario. It should be noted that the <br /> screening levels are guidelines and are not enforceable regulatory standards. <br /> The DTSC-Recommended SLs for evaluating soil vapor intrusion are calculated using indoor air screening <br /> levels and recommended attenuation factors. These calculated soil vapor screening levels are typically <br /> applied to samples collected no more than five feet below ground surface, and have been developed for <br /> both existing buildings and future buildings (DTSC and CaIEPA, October 2011). The values calculated <br /> using Note No. 3 recommendations are very conservative, and concentrations in excess of the calculated <br /> DTSC-Recommended SLs are not conclusive evidence of adverse risks to human health. Depending on <br /> VOC concentrations, their distribution, land use, and other factors, additional investigation — such as <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.