Laserfiche WebLink
Soil encountered during drilling consisted of sand, clay, and silt to a depth of 25 feet bgs (the maximum depth <br /> explored). Groundwater was encountered at the site in all borings at approximately 23 feet bgs. <br /> 5.0 Analytical Results <br /> The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) is the primary <br /> authority in California for environmental assessment of contaminated sites in the state. In addition,San Francisco <br /> Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB or Waterboard) has published interim guidance for soil, <br /> groundwater, air, and soil vapor intrusion screening levels (ESLs). Various DTSC and Waterboard screening levels <br /> are referenced in the tables of this report to evaluate the laboratory results as they apply to the various exposure <br /> scenarios (such as residential, industrial/commercial, and/or construction worker property use/exposure). <br /> The SFBRWQCB ESLs issued in January 2019 are the current industry standard in California for preliminary <br /> environmental groundwater and soil vapor screening.These ESLs are not cleanup action levels; do not necessarily <br /> indicate contamination; and are intended for use as guidance only. DTSC HERO issued an updated Human Health <br /> Risk Assessment (HHRA) Note No. 3 in June 2020. In this note, DTSC makes recommendations regarding the <br /> methodology and use of the U.S. EPA Regional Screening Levels(RSLs)and DTSC-modified screening levels(jointly <br /> referred to herein as "DTSC Recommended SLs") for soil vapor screening under residential and <br /> commercial/industrial land use scenarios. <br /> The DTSC-Recommended SLs for evaluating soil vapor intrusion are calculated using indoor air screening levels <br /> and recommended attenuation factors. These calculated soil vapor screening levels are typically applied to <br /> samples collected no more than five feet below ground surface and have been developed for both existing <br /> buildings and future buildings (DTSC and CaIEPA, October 2011). The values calculated using Note No. 3 <br /> recommendations are considered conservative, and concentrations in excess of the calculated DTSC- <br /> Recommended SLs are not considered conclusive evidence of adverse risks to human health. Depending on VOC <br /> concentrations, distribution, land use, and other factors, additional investigation such as soil vapor sampling, <br /> indoor air assessments, site-specific health risk assessments, etc. may be warranted to further assess site-specific <br /> health risks. <br /> Analytical results compared to the applicable screening levels are described below, and in summary Tables 1 <br /> through 7 at the end of this report. All laboratory analytical data is included in Appendix D of this report for <br /> reference. <br /> 5.1 Soil Results <br /> Selected soil samples were collected from soil borings SB1 through S133 and analyzed for one or more of the <br /> following analytical suites: VOCs via EPA Method 826013; TPH (full-range organics) via EPA Method 801513; and <br /> CAM 17 Metals via EPA Methods 6010B and 7471A. The soil sample results are summarized below. <br /> VOCs <br /> Three (3) soil samples were collected and analyzed for VOCs via EPA Method 8260B. All VOCs were below <br /> detection limits in all soil samples analyzed and are below the applicable industrial/commercial screening levels. <br /> The soil VOC results are presented in Table 1. <br /> Phase 11 Limited Subsurface Investigation <br /> Fulcrum Resources Environmental 2546 Turnpike Road,Stockton, California 95206 <br /> 202107-8656 <br /> 9 <br />