My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
701
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0529434
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2026 2:14:55 PM
Creation date
2/17/2026 2:01:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0529434
PE
2959 - DTSC LEAD AGENCY SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0019555
FACILITY_NAME
SOUTH POINTE DEVELOPMENT SITE (CITY OF STKN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY)
STREET_NUMBER
701
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13726016
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
701 W WEBER AVE STOCKTON 95202
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 17,2023 <br /> Rania Zabaneh <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> Reference:Transmittal of Supplemental Site Investigation Work Plan and Response to Comments-South Pointe <br /> Property-701, 705,833,&855 West Weber Avenue,Stockton,California <br /> below grade from boreholes 32, 36, 38, and 40 (advanced along the southwest border of the <br /> property) will be analyzed for pentachlorophenol. <br /> Comment #3 - Historical operations at the site included steam boilers, which often used descaling <br /> chemicals, such as hexavalent chromium. Any elevated chromium detections from soil sample <br /> analyses should be further assessed for hexavalent chromium. <br /> Stantec response: Historical data indicate that chromium is not a site-related chemical of <br /> concern.The previous investigator (Wallace Kuhl) analyzed 189 samples for chromium. <br /> Concentrations ranged from 18 to 68 mg/kg, with an average and mean concentration of 42 <br /> mg/kg. Although no human health-based screening level exists for total chromium (among DTSC <br /> SLs, USEPA RSLs, and RWQCB ESLs), the concentrations do not exceed the terrestrial habitat ESL of <br /> 160 mg/kg, and the mean concentration of 42 mg/kg is below the mean benchmark for <br /> background chromium in California soils of 69 mg/kg established by Kearney Foundation of Soil <br /> Science (March 1996). Total chromium has been added to the list of 'additional soil COCs' <br /> whereby 20% of primary samples will be analyzed for additional COCs, including total chromium. <br /> Additionally, soil samples from boreholes 35 and 36, advanced in the vicinity of the historical boiler, <br /> will be analyzed for chromium. The samples containing the two highest and the two lowest <br /> reported concentrations of total chromium will be additionally analyzed for hexavalent chromium <br /> to evaluate the potential presence of hexavalent chromium at the site. <br /> Comment #4-According to the GeoTracker website database, "fertilizers" have been identified <br /> by the State Water Resources Control Board as a contaminant of concern. Site documents <br /> indicate the presence of a former fertilizer mixing area. It should be determined if the on-property <br /> wells, MW-34 and MW-35, associated with the adjacent McCormick & Baxter Superfund site, have <br /> been assessed for nitrogen and perchlorate. If not, the analysis of the proposed grab <br /> groundwater samples should include these contaminants. <br /> Stantec response: Existing onsite groundwater monitoring wells MW-34 and MW-35 are associated <br /> with the upgradient L&M Operable Unit site. Based on our review of historical data for these wells, <br /> nitrogen and perchlorate have not been sampled in these wells. Therefore, grab groundwater <br /> samples will be additionally analyzed for these compounds. <br /> Comment #5 -Tables 1 and 2 indicate that some soil samples collected from the surface and from <br /> very shallow depths are to be analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Surface and very <br /> shallow soil, exposed to sunlight and atmospheric effects, will contain little to no VOCs. For the <br /> proposed sampling event at this site, the soil samples submitted for VOC analysis should be <br /> collected from depths no shallower than 3.5 feet below surface. <br /> Stantec response: The sampling matrix has been adjusted so that VOC analysis is conducted on <br /> samples located 3.5 feet or greater below ground surface. <br /> Comment #6 - In contrast to VOCs, soil samples for PCB analysis should be collected from surface <br /> soil. Aside from the samples proposed to be collected from the soil pile, which contains mixed <br /> material, soil samples for PCB analysis should be collected from surface material, or the material <br /> Design with community in mind <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.