Laserfiche WebLink
4.2 Filter Cake from Metal Finishine Pretreatment Facility <br />Site 2010 quantity (lb) <br />SLAC 12,507 <br />Input Materials: <br />Non -hazardous <br />wastewater from metal <br />plating operations, <br />spent cleaning and <br />plating baths (Category <br />A Hazardous Waste) <br />including: <br />stment, <br />Filter Cake <br />, coagulation, <br />from MFPF <br />on, filtration, <br />(CWC 181) <br />ryingarge <br />q <br />of <br />Off-site <br />waterdisposal <br />TW <br />FIGURE I11.4.2. RINSE WATER TREATMENT PROCESS AND WASTE GENERATION FLOW <br />DIAGRAM <br />Hazardous Waste and Process Description <br />The major generator of this waste stream at SLAC is the MFO Group in the MFD, which <br />performs plating of carbon steel, stainless steel, copper and aluminum parts. The various <br />baths clean parts and plate them with metal such as nickel, copper, tin, rhodium, indium, <br />silver and gold. <br />Non -hazardous rinse water is generated by using tap or de -ionized water to rinse residual <br />plating solutions from parts being plated. The non -hazardous rinse water and spent <br />plating baths (Category A wastes — acids and alkaline with metals but not cyanide baths) <br />are treated at the MFPF, which allows SLAC to meet the sanitary sewer discharge <br />requirements to the local POTW authorized under the Clean Water Act. The quantity of <br />the filter cake will in part fluctuate from year to year based on the quantities of <br />Category A wastes - alkaline cleaners (CWC 121) and spent acids (CWC 792) treated. <br />Since these baths are more concentrated than the rinse water, these waste streams can <br />generate a higher quantity of filter cake and thus raise the ratio of the pounds of filter <br />cake to gallons of rinse water treated. Other variations in this ratio are not easily <br />accounted for-, however, overall there is a trend toward decreasing this ratio that is <br />discussed later in this section. <br />The treatment process includes pH adjustment, precipitation, coagulation, solid <br />separation, filtration and drying processes to remove metals and adjust the pH of the <br />water before discharge. As a result of the process, a filter cake is generated, which is <br />subsequently sent off-site for disposal to a permitted treatment, storage and disposal <br />facility. <br />Because the filter cake from Category A aqueous hazardous waste treatment and from <br />non -hazardous rinse water treatment are not segregated, some double -counting of filter <br />cake occurs. Since an integrated approach is being considered to reduce rinse water <br />usage and to eliminate cyanide baths and rinse waters, the double -counting is not <br />considered an issue for SLAC. SLAC is trying to achieve source reduction in filter cake <br />by reducing its non -hazardous rinse water usage. <br />Hazardous Waste Management Approaches <br />Two noteworthy practices have been implemented by MFO that have helped reduce filter <br />cake and chemical usage in the MFPF: <br />One major source reduction measure that has been implemented since 2006 was the <br />electrochemical generation of ferric hydroxide, which is used as a <br />coagulant/flocculating agent used in the sedimentation of metal precipitates. The <br />electrochemical system provides better control of ferric hydroxide in the treatment <br />process. An improved ferric chloride metering system acts as a backup for the <br />electrochemical system. The electrochemical process provides tighter control of the <br />iron hydroxide than ferric chloride injection. This in tum reduces the volume and <br />weight of the sludge that is generated during the removal of metals in the <br />sedimentation process. <br />2. A second source reduction measure was eliminating the use of hexavalent chromium <br />in cleaning and plating operations in the 2006 -to -2007 time period and using <br />alternative technologies that provide the benefits of hexavalent chromium without any <br />of the drawbacks. The elimination of hexavalent chromium provided several side - <br />benefits that are not easy to quantify, but definitely contributed to the following <br />achievements : <br />a. Eliminated the need to treat hexavalent chromium rinse waters in the MFPF, <br />thus helping to eliminate the tank that was used to convert hexavalent <br />chromium to trivalent chromium. <br />b. Reduced the generation of heavy metal sludge and treatment chemical usage <br />associated with the treatment of hexavalent chromium in the MFPF. <br />c. Eliminated the potential for worker exposure from hexavalent chromium in <br />the metal finishing and MFPF work areas. <br />The opportunities to further reduce filter cake are limited. Changing the composition of <br />the sludge to make it lighter may result in more metals passing through to the POTW. <br />The purity of rinse water used by MFO is high in order to retain a high degree of quality <br />that is needed for parts that can be in service in ultra-bigh vacuum environments used by <br />SLAC to operate the two-mile accelerator, as well as to conduct various experiments <br />demanding high purity materials under ultra-high vacuum conditions. <br />Rinse water is necessary to meet the stringent cleaning and plating specifications required <br />at SLAC. MFO strives to reduce quantities of rinse water usage in its operations where <br />feasible. The MFPF is a conventional pH adjustment -flocculation -sedimentation <br />September 1, 2011 SB14 Plan 28 September 1, 2011 SB14 Plan 29 <br />