My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000084
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ALPINE
>
1235
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543389
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000084
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2018 5:13:21 PM
Creation date
11/1/2018 10:38:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000084
FileName_PostFix
XR0000084
RECORD_ID
PR0543389
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004512
FACILITY_NAME
MAJOR STATIONS
STREET_NUMBER
1235
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ALPINE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
11533055
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1235 E ALPINE AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
assess quality control, one primary sample will be split into two portions and one portion <br /> assigned a fictitious sample code to serve as a field duplicate All samples will be analyzed for <br />' TPH-G and BTEX <br /> 3.2.2 Geotechnical Review <br />' A geotechnical review of the relationship of the existing building onsite to the extent and depth <br /> of the additionally proposed excavation will be conducted The primary focus will be to <br />' determine if catastrophic failure or settling sufficient to damage the building may occur If <br /> catastrophic failure is a possibility, demolition of the building will be recommended If possible <br /> settlement damage is possible, a cost benefit analysis of installing shoring will be conducted to <br />' determine if shoring or demolition is preferable <br /> 3.2.3 Additional Tank Area Excavation Procedures <br /> The maximum depth of the additional tank area excavation is targeted at 40 feet below grade <br /> To allow excavation to this depth, the following procedure will be used <br /> soil stockpile® Relocate the existing (after additional sampling is complete) to the northeast <br /> corner of the property <br /> 0 Construct a ramp down to the level of approximately 20 feet below grade to access the <br /> previous excavation Soil from the ramp which will come from the unaffected area <br /> onsite will be stored separately to fill the ramp area upon completion of the protect. <br /> O Excavate the prior excavation area to a maximum of 40 feet below grade utilizing a <br />' mobile laboratory to control the excavation Sampling and analysis will be conducted on <br /> every 50 cubic yardsof soil removed All soils will be stockpiled separately on plastic <br />' sheeting and saver ecision on xn isposa ion a cons usion of the <br /> excavation, i total of eight samples wiTrYe en Trom the excavation floor and lower <br /> sidewalls for analysis o TPH-G and BTEX to confirm that soil containine elevated <br />' by rocar on concentrations has been removed <br /> During the excavation, air monitoring will be conducted in the area of the excavation with an <br />' Organic Vapor Monitor instrument Should the instrument indicate sustained reading in the <br /> breathing zone above background concentrations determined prior to the start of excavation <br /> operations, Draeger tube monitoring will be utilized to specifically test for benzene If the tube <br />' monitoring shows concentrations above 1 ppm, excavation operations will cease and the protect <br /> will be re-evaluated Should no benzene be detected, operations will continue unless the OVM <br /> readings exceed 50 ppm (based on ethylbenzene exposure cntena) in which case operations will <br />' also be discontinued pending evaluation of the source of the air emissions <br /> 3.2.4 Handling and Disposition of Soils <br /> Assuming offsite disposal is the preferred alternative for disposition of the sods and the onsite <br /> SVE approach is not resurrected, disposal of the sods will either be accomplished by <br />' transportation to a Class II landfill (if TPH-G does not exceed 1,000 mg/Kg) or to a Class I <br /> 12 11/13/92 <br />' SThCSRP'I'SIAREG3QTR WP G <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.