Laserfiche WebLink
May-05-2009 04'08 PM Jack In the Box 658 ,2116 2/6 <br /> y XC 19 'Cel 00140PM CS HEALTH FOOD DRUG P.214 <br /> stas9 of Callforniz Depzrtmant of Health Servl <br /> Memorandum <br /> Date: December 13,2000 <br /> To: Allen Stzo>x,KESS ' <br /> From: Jeff Lineberry <br /> Subject= Review of the revised Jack-in-the-Box Eggpreparadon pzceedures <br /> Jack-in-the-Box,Inc. (71:8)prepares sandwiches made from fried,fresh,shall egga in their <br /> restaurants in California. JIB operates ptusuant to a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point <br /> (ld'ACCP)plan in their restaurants. The plan was prepared in accordance with the requirements <br /> of Section 124055 of the California Uniform Retail Food Facllities Law (CURFfL). <br /> Grill operators break epgs into cooking zings on calibrated griddles at 350 degrees F Grill <br /> operators thea use a cloth towel soaked in a sariitizer solution to wipe their Angus before <br /> touching ready to eat foods With their bare hands. CURFFL Section 114020(c)(4)requires a <br /> thorough hand washing after handling raw foods and before handling ready-to-eat foods. JIB <br /> has submitted documentation in support of their HACCP plan procedure in lieu of the CLWI- . <br /> handwashing requirement,saying that operational constraints snake a thorough hand wash after <br /> cracking each egg impractical, and their procedure offers results equivalent to handwashing. <br /> I <br /> As a general rule, good sanitary practices do not recognize the use of a sanitizes alone as a <br /> j substitute for thorough cleaning. Sanifters generally are not designed to penetrate grease or <br /> soil on hands. Where bacteria lurk on hands under grease or soil deposits on hands,sanitizers <br /> may not be effective. The mechanical action of rubbing the hands and fingers to'r,cther in <br /> combination with warm water and a surfactant is considered to be effective for removal of soil <br /> and bacteria from the hands. Additionally,the use of sanitizers on hands is not required by,nor <br /> recognized in CURF'FL. <br /> However, several key factors work-in favor of acceptance of the JIB procedures. Egg handling <br /> must be considered in the context of the oveFall JIB I ALM food safety management system. <br /> J1B food handlers are required to wash their hands at least every 60 minutes during their work <br /> period, and additionally upon revarning from the toilet,if their hands becomo soiled,after <br /> tour- ing their,hair or other parts of their body,etc. The PP procedure does not rely on a simple <br /> dip into hand sanitizer,but instead combines wiping of the fingertips with a sanitizes soaked <br /> towel. The,mechanical•action of the towel on the fingertips can be expected to add to the <br /> effectiveness of the procedure_ 11B has a model program for egg producors and distributors, <br /> cmployxng standards that have bean shown to reduce the incidence of S. enre7idW3 in fresh, <br /> shell eggs.Studias have shown that the number of pathogenic bacteria in a single fresh,intact, <br /> egg is generally a low number,especially in the albumen. JIB does not pool eggs. Pooling of <br /> tggs hag be,:n shown to be a major factor outbreaks caused by S. enteriditU. SM managere are <br /> trained, and monitor implementation of the HACCP Plan and food safety practices,including <br /> pro-car handwashing. <br /> Docurnentatibn provided to FDB in support of M procedures used the.bacteria Serratia <br /> lnarascens to challe-nge the sanitizer. FDB feels that substitutior,of this Gram negative <br /> z9LZ00 <br />