My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CALIFORNIA
>
408
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0517328
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2019 2:58:26 PM
Creation date
2/14/2019 1:35:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0517328
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0013343
FACILITY_NAME
ABDULLA, MUTAHER PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
408
STREET_NAME
CALIFORNIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
13923022
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
408 CALIFORNIA ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geological Technics lKc. <br /> *.✓ N%.01 Page 2 <br /> Golden State Smog Check <br /> SI Report <br /> Project No.: 947.2 <br /> December 7,2001 <br /> California. A review of the Haines records reveals that the Property has been in commercial <br /> use (automotive related businesses) since 1950. The Sanborn records reveal that the <br /> Property was used for residential purposes from 1917 through 1950. The assessor's records <br /> revealed that the Property was used as a gasoline/automotive service station from 1950 <br /> through 1968. The San Joaquin assessor's records indicate that one 5,000 gallon, two 2,000 <br /> gallon and one 1,000 gallon underground storage tanks were used during the 1950s and <br /> 1960s. The locations of the former tanks are not known nor do we know if any <br /> underground storage tanks still remain on the site. There is a patch of asphalt on the <br /> southern portion of the property that may be the fonner location of one or more of the USTs <br /> (Figure 2). Currently there is one building, two awnings, vent piping on the east wall and a <br /> former dispenser island. <br /> The Property, which is approximately 10,000 square ft, is covered entirely by concrete or <br /> asphalt. At the present time two businesses are in operation on the Property. There is an <br /> automotive smog inspection shop and an automotive detail shop. <br /> 2.0 SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION <br /> On November 21, 2001, Geological Technics Inc. supervised the drilling of 2 boreholes <br /> using GeoProbe direct push method to investigate the possibility of soil being impacted by <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons. <br /> 2.1 Borehole Drilling& Soil Sample Collection <br /> The Site Map in Figure 2 shows the locations that the boreholes.were drilled. <br /> The boreholes were drilled with a GeoProbe rig owned and operated by V&W Drilling of <br /> Rio Vista, CA (C57# 720904). The GeoProbe advances a continuous coring tool with a <br /> pneumatic hammer to a selected depth. The soil sample enters an acetate cylinder contained <br /> in the coring tool. Upon filling, the coring tool is pulled from the hole and the cylinder is <br /> removed. The cylinder is then cut and the selected interval is preserved for laboratory <br /> analysis. The remainder of the sample was used for geologic logging. All soil samples <br /> were capped with plastic end caps, labeled and placed in a cooler at 4° Celsius for transport <br /> to the laboratory following Chain of Custody protocol. <br /> The GeoProbe borings were advanced to a depth of 26-feet bgs. Soil samples were <br /> collected at 5-foot intervals for geologic logging. The 10-foot sample from borehole #1, the <br /> 15.5-foot sample from borehole #2 and the 25-foot soil samples from each borehole were <br /> submitted to Sherwood Labs in Hilmar, CA for analysis. Since only selected samples were <br /> to be submitted for laboratory analysis, a screening process was used to gather additional <br /> information through field observation. This information was used to detennine which <br /> samples were to be analyzed. <br /> The following characteristics were noted in the screening process: <br /> • sediment type, especially grain size and clay content <br /> • moisture content <br /> • visible evidence of contamination, i.e., color change due to reduction of iron or <br /> discoloration from hydrocarbons and other pollutants <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.