My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2000 - 2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CALIFORNIA
>
3212
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231035
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2000 - 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2024 2:39:12 PM
Creation date
3/26/2019 2:45:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2000 - 2006
RECORD_ID
PR0231035
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0006773
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO 02186
STREET_NUMBER
3212
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CALIFORNIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12532001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3212 N CALIFORNIA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
391
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring System Certification <br /> Site Address: 3212 N. CALIFORNIA Date of Testing/Service: 10/03/2006 <br /> PTO# N-79 <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: 17.02 <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> X Yes ❑No Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ❑X Yes ❑No Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ❑X Yes ❑No Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> F71 Yes E]No <br /> Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not <br /> ' <br /> interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑No M N/A If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,is all communications equipment(e.g.modem)operational? <br /> For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> TI Yes ❑No' ❑N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected?If yes:which sensors initiate positive <br /> shut-down?(check all that apply) ❑X Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑X Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks ala d sensor failure/disconnection? ❑x Yes ❑No <br /> X❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e.:no mechanical <br /> overfill prevention valve is installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s)and operating <br /> properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 90 /o <br /> ❑ Yes- ❑X No Was any monitoring equipment replaced?If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced and list the <br /> manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes- ❑X No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems?(check all that apply) ❑Product; <br /> ❑ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ❑X Yes ❑No Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set-up reports,if applicable. <br /> ❑X Yes ❑No' Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers'specifications? <br /> *In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Page 2 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.