Laserfiche WebLink
A *Moe <br /> ll SAFEWAYINC. P Fr?,'-.,7; r�;�4,�r T! <br /> 4TH &JACKSON STREETS �E <br /> OAKLAND, CA 94660 Cis 9 PM �• r <br /> January 13 , 1995 J <br /> Mr. Steve Sasson <br /> San Joaquin County - Environmental Health Division <br /> 224 N. San Joaquin Street <br /> Stockton, CA 95201-0388 <br /> SUBJECT: Safeway Meat Processing Plant <br /> 1111 Navy Drive, Stockton <br /> Review Status of Groundwater Conditions <br /> Dear Mr. Sasson: <br /> On December 16, 1995, ERM-West forwarded to you the <br /> November, 1994, groundwater sampling results for the subject <br /> property. By now you should have received and reviewed the <br /> results. There has been virtually no change in the diesel <br /> concentrations over the last two and one-half years. The <br /> attached table summarizes the data to-date. <br /> In two of four samples analyzed for coliform, positive <br /> results have been reported for the sampling events in June <br /> 1992 and November 1994 . Drinking water standards are less <br /> than 1 MPN/100 ml level for coliform. The most recent <br /> sample results for November, 1994 exceed this standard by <br /> over 100 percent. Safeway has not contributed to this <br /> coliform problem. It is most likely due to releases from <br /> the 36 inch to 48 inch sewer mains located within Navy St. <br /> It is quite possible, therefore, that other contaminants may <br /> have entered the groundwater from the sanitary sewer. <br /> In your October 17, 1994 letter to Safeway, you requested <br /> Safeway to prepare a workplan to assess the lateral. and <br /> vertical extent of the hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater. <br /> Safeway requested an extension in assessing the conditions <br /> of the site, and you verbally granted that extension. <br /> After reviewing the site data generated to date, <br /> interviewing the local water purveyor (Cal Water Services <br /> Co. ) , and reviewing other underground tank site files <br /> located within the Navy and Charter Way area, Safeway does <br /> not believe it would' be beneficial, financially feasible, or <br /> necessary to pursue further site investigations. We request <br /> that the site be considered for closure for the following <br /> reasons: <br /> ®Recycled <br /> Paper <br />