Laserfiche WebLink
E}3.� <br /> Du Pont HLR 399-07 <br /> intru6orctton/Purpose <br /> Ground Yater Siorumedistion Serviced, a Du Pont service organization, hos <br /> accepted the responsibility for cleaning up the subsurface coil and crater <br /> contaminated with gasoline at a Kayo station in Lodi, California. As part of <br /> the microbiological support for this effort this project was initiated to <br /> determine the appropriate nutrient combinations and concentrations for <br /> optimal in situ biodegradation-of the contaminated soil and water. <br /> Materie4s/Ptethoda <br /> Samples were collected using aseptic techniques and sent for microbic- <br /> logical testing within 24 hr. The samples were stored at 40C before and <br /> aftcr testing. Sample descriptions are listed in Table 1. The water <br /> (M-18780) was divided into two lots and the one lot was sterilized by <br /> autoclosving for 30 min. The autoclaved water was subsequently used for soil <br /> slurry studies. The other lot of water was kept refrigerated until tested. <br /> Nutrient Optimization Study Using a 14C-labelled Substrate <br /> A radiolabelled substrate (m--ring- 14 <br /> -- C]Xylene from Amersham <br /> Laboratories; specific activity of 853 uCi/rag)) was used to represent <br /> moderately recalcitrant materials found in gasoline. Sixty milliliter serum <br /> bottles were arranged according to Table 2 (1-20). Each treatment consisted <br /> s of nine replicates such that triplicate bottles could be tested for three <br /> time periods (4, 24, end 72 hr). Nutrients were prepared in 7% stock <br /> solutions (the sodium phosphate solution was a 50:50 mixture of the dibasic <br /> and monobasic chemicals and ammonium chloride served as the nitrogen source) <br /> and diluted to the final concentrations shown in Table 2. A 25% soil slurry <br /> i sea prepared with groundwater and 8-1 12 (M-18779) or NW-19 BA (M-16773) <br /> soil. Following nutrient addition to the bottles, 10 mL of the appropriate <br /> soil slurry was added to the bottles. Controls consisted of formaldehyde <br /> treated (10 ppm) and untreated coil slurries. Absy4ute ethanol and unlabeled <br /> xylene were used to remove the minute quantity of C-labeled xylene from the <br /> distillation tube (supplied by the manufacturer) and reduce the specific <br /> activity of the compound. A final concentration of 1 ppm total xylene was <br /> achieved by. diapensing the appropriate amount of diluted material into each <br /> test bottle. The battles were closed with a rubber stopper containing a <br /> r plastic bucket and filter paper (the stopper, bucket, and filter were <br /> ethylene oxide sterilized). Triplicate bottles were tested at three time <br /> periodet 4, 24, and 72. Phonethylamine (PEA) rias injected (0.2 mL )into the <br /> filter-paper,--follow94-by-a-small-quentity-of-sulfuric-acid-into-the <br /> - <br /> oalurry, to drive the carbon dioride from the liquid and into the.PEA <br /> maturated filter. The bottles were gently shaken for 4 hr to-facilitate the <br /> • •• 4 <br /> y <br />