Laserfiche WebLink
6E � <br /> GENESIS ENGINEERING&REDEVELOPMENT <br /> • Cost: For phosphate mixing, approximately $30 per yd (for 700 yd total at the <br /> Site, approximately $21,000). <br /> Excavation and Removal <br /> • Effectiveness: Removes all impacted soils, confirmation soil samples will verify <br /> that all impacted soil has been removed from the Site. Permanently removes <br /> impacted soil from the Site, with no deed or future land use restrictions. <br /> • Implementability: Need excavation equipment,trucks to haul soil to landfill, and <br /> soil sampling equipment. <br /> • Cost: Approximately $60,000 for excavation, hauling, and analytical <br /> characterization to dispose of approximately 700 yd of soil. <br /> The costs for DTSC oversight are estimated to be $30,000, and includes the Perspective <br /> Purchaser Agreement process, oversight of field work, reviewing the RAW report, and <br /> certification. <br /> 4.2 Evaluation Criteria <br /> The remedial goal of this RAW is to remove impacted soils and obtain closure for the Site. <br /> The future land use intended by the prospective buyer includes an elementary school. Based <br /> on the intended land use, natural attenuation and isolation/stabilization do not meet the <br /> remedial goal because: <br /> • Natural attenuation would degrade the petroleum hydrocarbons, PCB, and dioxin, <br /> but would not break down the metals in the soil; and <br /> • Isolation/stabilization also does not remove the impacted soil from the Site. The <br /> constituents of concern would be immobilized in the soil,but the constituents of <br /> concern still have the ability to become mobile in the soil at a later date. <br /> Isolation/stabilization would limit future land use and would not be appropriate if <br /> the land is used to build an elementary school. <br /> Soil washing is capable of meeting remedial goals. After soil washing,the COPC are <br /> concentrated in the fine-grained soils which require off-Site disposal. Since the COPC are <br /> concentrated in the fine-grained fraction,waste classification may not meet the non- <br /> hazardous criteria resulting in increased disposal costs. In addition, the washing costs are <br /> approximately twice those for excavation and disposal. <br /> Excavation and off-Site disposal will meet the remedial goal by removing impacted soil <br /> followed by sampling to confirm all impacted soils have been excavated. This remedial <br /> alternative was chosen because it meets the remedial goal, does so in a timely manner, and is <br /> the approximately half the cost of soil washing. <br /> Former Gordon Research Company Property 12 of 20 <br /> Removal Action Workplan <br /> June 2017 <br />