My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2001 - 2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
2448
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231948
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2001 - 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2022 9:19:58 AM
Creation date
4/26/2019 4:27:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2001 - 2006
RECORD_ID
PR0231948
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003855
FACILITY_NAME
TESORO (SHELL) 68153
STREET_NUMBER
2448
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
05814001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2448 W KETTLEMAN LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MONITC 71NG SYSTEM CERTIF"'ATION <br /> CERTIFICATION / TEST DATE: July 28, 2006 <br /> Al. FACILITY A2. OWNER <br /> Name USA Petroleum #3696 Name USA Petroleum Corporation <br /> Address 2448 W. Kettleman Ln., Lodi,CA 95242 Address 3034 N. Glacier Way, Hanford,CA 93230 <br /> Phone# 559-585-8156 Phone# 559-585-8156 <br /> Contact Sandy Edwards Contact Sandy Edwards <br /> D. RESULTS OF TESTING / SERVICING <br /> Make / Model of Monitoring System: Veeder-Root TLS-350 <br /> Software Version Installed: <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment <br /> will not Interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,Is all communications equipment(e.g.modems) <br /> ■ NIA operational? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down If the piping secondary containment <br /> ■ N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or Is electrically disconnected? If yes:which sensors Inmate <br /> positive shutdown? (check all that apply) ❑ Sump/Trench sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> ❑ Yes ■ No* Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e.no <br /> ■ N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % <br /> ■ Yes* ❑ No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* ■ No Was any liquid found Inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? <br /> (Check all that apply) ❑ Product; ❑ Water. If yes,describe causes In Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes ■ No" Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to Insure proper settings? Attach set-up reports,If applicable. <br /> ■ Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. COMMENTS <br /> This is a Monitoring Certification of the 89 annular sensor only. <br /> The original Monitoring Certification was done by others. <br /> During the original certification, the 89 annular sensor was unable to be removed from the tank. <br /> Walton Engineering removed and replaced the 89 annular sensor. <br /> Upon completion of the Monitoring Certification's 89 annular sensor the Veeter-Root monitor <br /> was inaccessible to obtain the system Set-up and Alarm History reports. <br /> S'2006 Walton Engineering,Inc. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.