COMPLIANCE INFO 2002 - 2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

On March 23, 2006, Franzen-Hill Corp. tightened up the test boot clamps and retested UDCs 1/2 and 3/4. Both passed (Attachment 14). On March 27, 2006, a letter was received by this office from Mr. Silva addressing the violations noted on the January 20, 2006 UST and hazardous waste inspection reports (Attachment 15). A signed return to compliance document for each inspection has not been received. On August 7, 2006, Ms. Luces, REHS, sent a follow up letter to the facility requesting items noted on the January 20, 2006 UST and hazardous waste inspection reports (Attachment 16). As of the date of this referral, none of the items have been submitted. 3408 Manthey Road, Stockton, Food 4 Less Fuel Center On January 16, 2003, Ms. Dina Abate, Senior REHS, EHD, performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 17) and witnessed the annual monitoring certification (Attachment 18) at this facility and found that the 87 and 91 leak detectors could not detect a 3.0 gph leak at 10 psi and a current financial responsibility had not been submitted to this office. The facility was also reminded that the six-month post construction secondary containment testing was now due. On January 21, 2003, Mr. Silva faxed a copy of the December 12, 2002 secondary containment test report to this office (Attachment 19). All components tested passed. On February 18, 2003, Franzen-Hill Corp. retested both leak detectors. Both detected a 3.0 gph leak at 10 psi (Attachment 20). On December 9, 2003, Ms. Abate called Mr. Silva to remind him that testing of spill buckets was due by the end of the month. Mr. Silva said that they would be tested on December 16. As of the date of this referral, a test report has not been received by this office for these tests. On February 5, 2004, Mr. Shih performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 21) and witnessed the annual monitoring certification (Attachment 22). The 91 piping sump sensor failed to trigger an alarm when tested and the 87 leak detector failed to detect a 3.0 gph leak at 10 psi. A current financial responsibility had not been submitted to this office and an updated monitoring and response plan was requested. On April 7, 2004, Mr. Shih witnessed the testing of the new piping sump sensor and the leak detector that failed during the last monitoring certification. On April 9, 2004, Mr. Shih received and filed a current copy of the financial responsibility. On May 14, 2004, Mr. Shih sent a follow up letter to the facility requesting the updated monitoring and response plans noted on the February 5, 2004, UST inspection report (Attachment 23). These were received on May 18, 2004. On February 8, 2005, Ms. Dina Craw, Senior REHS, performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 24) and witnessed the annual monitoring certification (Attachment 25) at this Page 3 of 20