COMPLIANCE INFO 2002 - 2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

facility. No violations were noted at the time of inspection and facility was reminded that secondary containment testing was due in December 2005. On March 20, 2006, Mr. Willy Ng, Senior REHS, performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 26) and witnessed the annual monitoring certification (Attachment 27) at this facility. Secondary containment testing was three months past due, monitoring certification, leak detector, and spill bucket testing was one month past due. Both 87 and 91 leak detectors failed to detect a 3.0 gph leak at 10 psi and a current financial responsibility had not been submitted to this office. On May 11, 2006, Mr. Ng sent a follow up letter to the facility requesting the items noted on the March 20, 2006 inspection report (Attachment 28). As of the date of this referral, a certification of financial responsibility and a return to compliance document have not been received by this office. On May 22, 2006, Mr. Ng received a secondary containment test report from Franzen-Hill Corp. for testing performed on March 22, 2006 (Attachment 29). Most of the components were not tested due to a lack of test boots. On July 10, 2006, Mr. Muniappa Naidu received a call from Vernon with Franzen-Hill Corp. Test boots were installed to complete the secondary containment testing. Mr. Naidu was told that all UDCs passed, but the piping runs failed. Mr. Ng called and left a message for Mr. Silva to call back regarding these failed test results. As of the date of this referral, a secondary containment test report has not been received by this office for these tests. On July 11, 2006, Mr. Silva called and left a message for Mr. Ng. The leak detectors were not able to detect a 3.0 gph leak at 10 psi due to damaged siphon jet valves, and were repaired "within a week." Mr. Ng received a call from Kurt from Stockton Service Station who said the siphon jet valves were replaced and the leak detectors were retested. He was not told it was due to a failure during a monitoring certification, so he did not call for an inspection. A time was set for the next day to retest with an inspection from this office. Mr. Ng called and left a message for Mr. Silva informing him that leak detectors were to be retested. On July 13, 2006, Mr. Ng witnessed testing of both leak detectors by Stockton Service Station Equipment. Both detected a 3.0 gph leak at 10 psi (Attachment 30). No known repairs have been made to the secondary containment piping runs reported by the July 10, 2006,phone call from Vernon of Franzen-Hill. 678 N. Wilson Way, Stockton, Food 4 Less On November 19, 2001, Ms. Le, Senior REHS, EHD, performed a final inspection and approved this facility to operate a UST system. Mr. Silva was issued a report (Attachment 31) which asked him to submit a financial responsibility document by December 19, 2001 and reminded Page 4 of 20