COMPLIANCE INFO 2002 - 2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

him that a monitoring certification and line leak detector testing is due annually and secondary containment testing was due six months from that day and every three years thereafter. On October 2, 2002, secondary containment testing was performed by Tanknology, five months late (Attachment 32). Both piping runs and UDC 3/4 failed. On December 5, 2002, Ms. Abate sent a letter to the facility informing them that the annual monitoring certification and leak detector testing was past due and to have these tests done by January 5, 2003 (Attachment 33). On December 9, 2002, the failed components from the last secondary containment testing were retested by Franzen-Hill Corp. after tightening some test boot clamps. Both piping runs and UDC 3/4 passed (Attachment 34). On January 16, 2003, Ms. Abate performed routine UST and hazardous waste inspections (Attachments 35 and 36) and witnessed the annual monitoring certification (Attachment 37). A current financial responsibility and monitoring and response plans have not been submitted to this office and the monitoring and response plans were not found onsite at the time of inspection. Liquid was found in the 87 and 91 octane fill sumps and both leak detectors failed to detect a 3.0 gph leak at 10 psi. Hazardous waste containers were improperly labeled. This facility also did not have a valid EPA ID number to handle hazardous waste or a contingency plan. On February 18, 2003, both leak detectors were retested and passed (Attachment 38). On April 8, 2003, Ms. Abate filed the certification of return to compliance and a statement of corrections from the January 16, 2003 hazardous waste inspection (Attachment 39). On February 5, 2004, Mr. Shih performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 40) and witnessed the annual monitoring certification (Attachment 41). A current financial responsibility and updated monitoring and response plans had not been submitted to this office and the updated monitoring and response plan was not found onsite at the time of inspection. Both leak detectors failed to detect a 3.0 gph leak at 10 psi. On April 9, 2004, Mr. Shih received and filed a current copy of the financial responsibility. On April 14, 2004, Mr. Shih sent a follow up letter requesting items required on February 5, 2004 UST inspection report (Attachment 42). On May 20, 2004, Mr. Shih filed the updated monitoring and response plans received on May 18, 2004. On May 28, 2004, Mr. Shih received a test report for the April 7, 2004 retest of both leak detectors (Attachment 43). On February 8, 2005, Ms. Dina Craw, performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 44) and witnessed the annual monitoring certification (Attachment 45). Liquid was found in the 87 and Page 5 of 20