Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. James L. Barton P.G. <br /> Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> December 3, 2015 <br /> Page 2 <br /> was detected in the soil sample collected at a depth of 23 feet bgs from Boring B-41 at a <br /> concentration of 40 mg/kg. <br /> Groundwater samples were also collected from each boring at discrete depths. The samples <br /> were analyzed for TPHg by EPA Test Method 8260, TPHd by EPA Test Method 80158, and <br /> VOCs by EPA Test Method 8260. TPHg and TPHd were detected in the groundwater sample <br /> collected at a depth of 15 feet bgs from Boring B-41 at concentrations of 990 and 350,000 pg/L, <br /> respectively. TPHd was also detected in the groundwater samples collected at 45 and 57 feet <br /> bgs at concentrations of 160 and 190 pg/L, respectively. <br /> Boring B-39 was drilled at the property boundary with the Union Pacific Railroad approximately <br /> 100 feet southeast of Boring B-41. A sample was collected from the first water encountered at <br /> 24 feet bgs. Analytical results of this sample indicated the presence of TPHg and TPHd at <br /> concentrations of 430 pg/L and 63,000 pg/L respectively. Boring B-36, approximately 100 feet <br /> northwest of Boring B-41, did not have detectable concentrations of TPHg or TPHd at first <br /> groundwater. The remaining borings northeast(Boring B-37) and southwest(B-38) of Boring B- <br /> 41 detected TPHd at a maximum concentration of 130 pg/L and based on the groundwater <br /> sampling conducted around boring B-41, URS concluded that groundwater concentrations <br /> decreased significantly both laterally and vertically away from Boring B-41. <br /> Various VOCs (1,1-Dichloroethene, 1,1-Dichloroethane, sec-Butyl Benzene, and cis-1,2- <br /> Dichloroethene) were detected at low levels (up to 7.0 pg/L) in groundwater samples from three <br /> borings (B-37, B-39 and B-41; however, none of the VOCs detected exceeded California <br /> Environmental Screening Levels. <br /> Groundwater flow direction at the site and in the B-7 area has historically been to the southwest. <br /> SCOPE OF WORK <br /> The Water Board's September 23 and 25 letters indicated that Well MW-5 in Area B-7 was <br /> reported to have the highest onsite concentrations of TPHd and that there was no vertical <br /> delineation of TPHd in this area. Per these findings, Amec Foster Wheeler proposes the <br /> installation of four soil borings in Area B-7 as detailed on Figure 2. Boring location rationale are <br /> as follows: <br /> • Location south-southwest of Well MW-5 to assess downgradient extent of TPHd <br /> • Location in vicinity of boring B-6 where TPHd was detected in a previous grab <br /> groundwater sample at a concentration of 21,000 pg/L <br /> • Location in vicinity of boring B-7 where TPHd was detected in a previous grab <br /> groundwater sample at a concentration of 5,300,000 pg/L <br /> • Location south-southwest of Well MW-1 B to assess downgradient extent of TPHd <br /> Amec Foster Wheeler <br />