My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CLAY
>
639
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544513
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2019 5:10:42 PM
Creation date
5/31/2019 4:51:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0544513
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0024115
FACILITY_NAME
WEST CLAY PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
639
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CLAY
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
14707110
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
639 W CLAY ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jeff Wong [EH] <br /> From: Jim Barton Obarton@waterboards.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 2:24 PM <br /> To: wlittle@advgeoenv.com <br /> Cc: Jeff Wong [EH] <br /> Subject: 639 W. Clay St., Stockton <br /> Hi Bill, <br /> Got your phone call yesterday on the status of 639 W. Clay St. , Stockton. You were <br /> wondering if there were comments to the bench scale test that I received on 13 May 2005. <br /> I had a chance to take another look at the 29 April 2005 McCambell Analytical report (Re: <br /> Ozone Experiment Details and Result Discussion) . As I see it, the report rambles a bit, <br /> and has a great deal of uncertainty spoken to address things that should have not happened <br /> during the test (acetone & methyl ethyl ketone formation, problems with lab equipment & <br /> cross-contamination, etc. ) . It does contain recommendations to improve future bench scale <br /> testing. The bottom line is that Cr6+ was produced by ozone injection. The Cr6+ reverted <br /> back (for the most part) to Cr3+ after the test was discontinued. <br /> The report does include general stoichiometry but the reactions are not correlated to the <br /> lab data. What the report lacks are tables to make the data results more readable. In <br /> the future Bill, for a bench scale test, you need to provide a letter report with the lab <br /> report, include data tables, a summary and conclusions section, with recommendations on <br /> how to conduct the pilot study based on the conclusions of this report. <br /> Your next step is to submit a workplan for the pilot study, which summarizes and draws on <br /> the conclusions of the bench scale report, to adequately monitor for petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons and potential impacts to water quality. If you have any additional <br /> questions, feel free to contact me. Thanks. <br /> Jim Barton <br /> James L.L. Barton, P.G. <br /> Engineering Geologist <br /> California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> Central Valley Region <br /> 11020 Sun Center Drive, Suite 200 <br /> Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 <br /> office (916) 464-4615 <br /> fax (916) 464-4704 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.