Laserfiche WebLink
State Wester Resources Controoard <br /> Division of Clean Water Programs <br /> Winston H.Hickox 2014 T Street•Sacramento,California 95814•(916)aTECHPHONE» <br /> Mailing Address: P.O.Box 944212•Sacramento,California•94244-2120 Gray Davis <br /> Secretaryfor <br /> Environmental FAX(916)227-4530•Internet Address: http://www.swreb.ca.gov/—cwphome/ustcf Governor <br /> Protection e� .}�. I � 02 <br /> September 13, 1999 <br /> Paul J. Van Dyken, Sr. <br /> N & S Irrigation <br /> P O Box 805 <br /> Ripon, CA 95366 <br /> PRE-APPROVAL OF CORRECTIVE ACTION COSTS, CLAIM NO. 012246, <br /> SITE ADDRESS: 215 MAIN ST W,RIPON, CA 95366 <br /> I have reviewed your request, received on August 7, 1999, for pre-approval of corrective action <br /> costs; I will place these documents in your file for future reference. I have included a copy of the <br /> "Cost Pre-Approval Request" form; please use this form in the future for requesting pre-approval <br /> of corrective actions costs. <br /> With the following provisions,the total cost pre-approved as eligible for reimbursement for four <br /> quarters of groundwater monitoring is $ 6,028; see the table below for a breakd6wn of costs. <br /> Be aware that this pre-approval does not constitute a decision on reimbursement: all <br /> reasonable and necessary corrective action costs for work directed and approved by the County <br /> will be eligible for reimbursement per the terms ofyour.Letter of Commitment at costs consistent <br /> with those pre-approved in this letter. <br /> All future costs for corrective action must be approved in writing by Fund staff. <br /> Future costs for corrective action must meet the requirements of <br /> Article 11, Chapter 16, Underground Storage Tank Regulations. <br /> COST PRE-APPROVAL BREAKDOWN <br /> Task Amount Pre-Approved Comments <br /> Groundwater monitoring and $3548 <br /> sampling of 3 wells(4 quarters) <br /> Report preparation (4quarters) $2480 <br /> TOTAL PRE-APPROVED $ 6,028 <br /> • The actual costs and scope of work performed must be consistent with the pre-approval for it <br /> to remain valid. <br /> • The work products must be acceptable to the County and the Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board. <br /> • It is my opinion that it is unnecessary to obtain three bids for this scope of work; the Fund's <br /> three bid requirement is waived for this scope of work. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> CO* Recycled Paper <br />