My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007861
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0800105
>
SU0007861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2020 11:37:03 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:03:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007861
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0800105
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
APN
20106003
ENTERED_DATE
8/11/2009 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/24/2009 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\EIR PA-0800105\NOP.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
687
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.B-36 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2014 Expansion Project <br /> long vehicle queues would form, and pedestrian safety would be diminished. For these <br /> reasons, a triple turn lane is infeasible. Thus,no mitigation measures are available to reduce <br /> this impact to a less-than-significant level, and the deterioration of LOS at this intersection in <br /> year 2035 (without the proposed project)would be a significant and unavoidable cumulative <br /> impact attributable to cumulative development without the proposed project. <br /> Implementation of a second northbound left turn lane would reduce the cumulative <br /> transportation impact at the Austin/Arch intersection to LOS E;however, the previously <br /> proposed project's additional contribution to the unacceptable level of service at the <br /> i Austin/Arch intersection would remain a significant unavoidable impact. This same impact <br /> would be the worst-case effect of the 2014 Expansion Project, which would not result in any <br /> new impacts not evaluated in the 2013 EIR. <br /> �- The intersection of SR 99 and Arch Road would operate at LOS F in both peak hours under <br /> cumulative 2035 conditions (without the project). Addition of project traffic to cumulative 2035 <br /> conditions would increase the delays at this intersection. The traffic study for the Mariposa <br /> L, Lakes development determined that this impact would be significant and unavoidable, and that <br /> no further mitigation is feasible. (TJKM,2007). Therefore, the previously proposed project's <br /> additional contribution to the unacceptable level of service at the SR 99/Arch would remain a <br /> significant unavoidable impact. This same impact would be the worst-case effect of the 2014 <br /> Expansion Project, which would not result in any new impacts not evaluated in the 2013 EIR. <br /> The intersection of SR 99 and Mariposa Road SB Ramp would operate at LOS F in both peak <br /> `•• hours under cumulative 2035 conditions (without the project). Addition of project traffic to <br /> cumulative 2035 conditions would increase the delays at this intersection. The traffic study for <br /> the Mariposa Lakes development determined that this impact would be significant and <br /> `, unavoidable, and that no further mitigation is feasible. Therefore, the previously proposed <br /> project's additional contribution to the unacceptable level of service at the SR 99/ Mariposa <br /> Road SB Ramp would remain a significant unavoidable impact. This same impact would be <br /> the worst-case effect of the 2014 Expansion Project, which would not result in any new impacts <br /> not evaluated in the 2013 EIR. <br /> The driveway of the CHCF would operate at an acceptable LOS C or better in 2035, as <br /> +,. mentioned above. In 2031, the last year of operation of the 2014 Expansion Project, this <br /> intersection would operate at the same or better LOS. The added traffic due to the 2014 <br /> Expansion Project (137 a.m. and 28 p.m. peak hour trips) is not expected to worsen the <br /> intersection to unacceptable conditions. Therefore, the 2014 Expansion Project would result in a <br /> less-than-significant cumulative impact at this new intersection. <br /> Newcastle Road Access <br /> L <br /> As described under Impact B.1, an alternate access to the landfill at Newcastle Road was <br /> considered in the 2013 EIR. That EIR found that, under year 2035 cumulative conditions with <br /> is, the use of Newcastle Road for landfill access, the intersections of Austin Road/Forward <br /> Driveway and Arch/Newcastle Road would operate at acceptable levels of service,but the <br /> Austin/Arch Roads,SR 99/Arch Road, and SR 99/Mariposa Road SB Ramp intersections <br /> 60 would operate at unacceptable Level of Service F, with an average delay similar to year <br /> cumulative 2035 conditions if the existing landfill entrance on Austin Road is used. Thus,use of <br /> Newcastle Road for landfill access for the previously proposed project would not avoid the <br /> deterioration of level of service at the Austin/Arch Roads,SR 99/Arch Road, and SR <br /> 99/Mariposa Road SB Ramp intersections to unacceptable conditions in the cumulative year <br /> 2035, and 2035 cumulative impacts with alternate access at Newcastle Road would be similar to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.