Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.B-37 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2014 Expansion Project <br /> those of the previously proposed project evaluated in the 2013 EIR. The 2014 Expansion Project <br /> would not generate traffic in 2035;however, the impacts described above would be the worst- <br /> case effect in 2031 of the 2014 Expansion Project. <br /> Mitigation Measure B.6. (Revises 2013 EIR Mitigation Measure B.6). Measures to reduce the <br /> cumulative impact at Austin/Arch Roads are available,but these measures would not reduce <br /> the impact at this intersection to a less-than-significant level. No mitigation measures are <br /> available that would reduce the impacts at SR 99/Arch Road or SR 99/Mariposa Road SB Ramp <br /> to a less than significant level. In the worst case (as discussed above), the 2014 Expansion <br /> Project's contributions to cumulative impacts at these three intersections, as defined by County + <br /> policy, would be considerable, and would be a significant unavoidable impact. <br /> Impact B.7. Potential Impact to LOS at Austin/Mariposa and Austin/French Camp Under Cumulative <br /> Conditions. (Revises 2013 EIR Impact B.7) <br /> Because the 2014 Expansion Project would not generate traffic, or make a contribution to <br /> cumulative traffic, in the year 2035, there would be no effect on LOS at all study intersections in <br /> 2035. Therefore, the 2014 Expansion Project would have no impact on these intersections. <br /> The 2013 EIR found that that the previously proposed project would have a potentially <br /> significant impact on the intersections of Austin Road and Mariposa Road, and Austin Road <br /> and French Camp Road, in the Cumulative Year 2035. In its last year of operation, 2031, the <br /> effects of the 2014 Expansion Project would be similar to, or less than, the effects of the <br /> previously proposed project evaluated in the 2013 EIR. These impacts, discussed below would <br /> represent the worst-case effect of the 2014 Expansion Project in 2031. <br /> The 2013 EIR found that the intersection of Austin Road and Mariposa Road would operate at <br /> unacceptable LOS D during the AM peak hour under cumulative 2035 conditions (without the <br /> project). Addition of project traffic to cumulative 2035 conditions, and, in the worst case, in <br /> 2031, would increase the delay. With addition of a new southbound right turn lane, this <br /> intersection would operate at LOS D, with a (decreased) delay value of 34.2. The estimated cost <br /> of this improvement is$117,000 (based on 1,560 square feet of pavement at$50 per square foot <br /> plus 50 percent for design, administration,and inspection). Because there are no other pending <br /> projects to share the cost, the share attributable to the proposed project is 100 percent. <br /> The intersection of Austin Road and French Camp Road would operate at acceptable LOS C <br /> during the PM peak hour under cumulative 2035 conditions (without the project). Addition of <br /> project traffic to cumulative 2035 conditions, and, in the worst case,in 2031, would degrade <br /> operations from LOS C to LOS D. With widening of the westbound approach to two lanes (a <br /> shared through-right lane and shared through-left lane), the resultant LOS would be C with a <br /> delay value of 18.9. The estimated cost of the improvement is$540,000 (7,200 square feet of -- <br /> pavement at$50 per square foot plus 50 percent for design, administration, and inspection). <br /> Because there are no other pending projects to share the cost, the share attributable to the <br /> proposed project is 100 percent. <br /> Mitigation Measure B.7. (Revises 2013 EIR Mitigation Measure B.7). The applicant shall <br /> commence traffic monitoring of the Austin/Mariposa and Austin/French Camp intersections <br /> on five-year intervals until such time as the first phase of development in the Mariposa Lakes <br /> development is constructed and occupied. After such time monitoring shall occur on an annual <br /> basis. Monitoring reports shall be prepared by a Professional Engineer as described in the <br /> County traffic impact guidelines.Monitoring shall include manual peak period turning -- <br /> movement counts with a summary report showing intersection LOS results. Design of the <br />