Laserfiche WebLink
-- - - APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF <br /> CROSSING <br /> FUTURE CREEK <br /> • 9080 RO <br /> 120 <br /> 130 <br /> 150140 ' <br /> I •. _— _ � T so I <br /> ♦;�—t 50 I 0 <br /> I'." ;4 •NORT�HFA TF6RTION-1so � _ 1 <br /> AIRSPACE VOLUME'. <br /> 3,343,910 CY g I <br /> no m <br /> RIWE � <br /> ------- <br /> AP ROXIMAT <br /> APPROXIMATE FUTURE LOCATION <br /> OF OFFICE TRAILER <br /> APPROXIMATE 10,000.FT RADIUS FROM / <br /> 9TOCKTON AIRPORT OPERATIONS AREA <br /> (SEE NOTE 5) <br /> I ' PROPOSEDSEDIMENTATIONSASIN <br /> 1 (SEE NOTE 4) <br /> ( <br /> PROPOSED POND <br /> / (BEE NOTE 4) <br /> i / ♦�. <br /> SOUTH POI <br /> PROPOSED I, �0 NET AIRSPACE VOLUME. <br /> SEDIMENTATION BASIN7a 4,773,110 CV <br /> 'so� (SEE NOTE 2) I 17'g4 APPROXIMATE LOCATION <br /> I OF FUTURE SOUTH <br /> GREEN CROSSING <br /> PROPOSED I70 <br /> LEACHATE POND �l' <br /> 0p —000 TOP OF CREEK BANK <br /> 90 <br /> S.TIo D. 15+D0 �ID'oo -�iSw � <br /> / TOPOFCREEKBANK PROPOSED CREEK <br /> ALIGNMENT <br /> LEGEND: NOTES <br /> — APPROXIMATEPROPERTY90UNDARY I. TOP OF OPERATIONS LAYER SHOWN,EXCAVATION GRADES WILL BE GLOWER. <br /> 2. TOTAL AIRSPACE IN SOUTH PORTION IS 7,153,260 CY CURRENT PERMTTTEDAWSPACE IS <br /> EXISTING REFUSE LIMAS Z380.170 CY THEREFORENETADDITIONAL AIRSPACE IS 4,773.110 CY. <br /> ----------PRO POSED REFUSE LIMAS 3. THEADDITIONALDEVELOPMENTAREASAREW IN THE FAA PART 77 HORIZONTAL AND <br /> CONICAL ZONES FOR THE STOCKTONAIRPORT,BUT FALL BELOW THESE IMAGINARY <br /> EXISTING PERMITTED CONTOURS SURFACES. <br /> PR OPOSEDSASEGRADES' 4. LOCATIONAND SIZE OF PROPOSED SEDIMENTATION BASIN AND LEACHATEPONDARE D B00' <br /> APPROXIMATE AND WILL BE SIZED AND LOCATED BASED ON OPERATIONAL NEEDS AT TIME <br /> PROPOSED CONTOURS(TOP OF FINAL COVER) OF CONSTRUCTION. <br /> APPROXIMATEAIRPORTCONICAL SURFACE AND IDODD�FT 5. FAA AC 150520033B RECOMMENDS 10,0 FT SEPARATION DISTANCE FROM WILDLIFE <br /> RADIUS FROM STOCKTON AIR OPERATIONS AREA ATTRACTANTS AND AIR OPERATIONS AREA. 1. 800 <br /> Figure III.0-6 <br /> Proposed Grading Plan Source:Lewis Engineering <br />